You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It depends on the settings.
Try GBPJPY and it will work.
Besides, as I see - the second version of this indicator is here Re: Обратное преобразование ФишераI have tried second version and the same problem.However it works at GBP/JPY as you recommended, not for EUR/USD .
Please read the post just above the post with your question for explanation
regards
mladen
I have tried second version and the same problem.However it works at GBP/JPY as you recommended, not for EUR/USD .
To avoid that "flat line" showing instead of showing "normal" value, un-check fixed minimum and maximum in the indicators properties and then you are going to get something like the second one on the picture. The problem is simple : cyber cycle is not too good to be "inverse fisher-ised" - for symbols with values smaller then 100 it can not reach the extremes (+1 and -1 in this case) and since it is not a kind of oscillator as Stochastic and RSI are (with known minimum and maximums) I am not sure of the usefulness of doing the inverse fisher on cyber cycle indicator
So do you mean the logic behind inverse fisherised of cyber cycle indicator is flawed? İt is like inverse fisherising MACD, correct?
Yes, almost the same
If you look at the attached document by John Elhlers you can see (between the lines, of course ) that even he was aware of that problem. It is not a just a chance that he decided to use those values (page 5 of the document) for inverse fisher of cyber cycle (almost perfect 100 as a basis for cyber cycle calculation, as you can see, and for some reason, he decided not to use the same data as in RSI example at page 3:))
John Ehlers sometimes does that : he invented a lot of very useful indicators but from time to time he does not bother with "details".
So do you mean the logic behind inverse fisherised of cyber cycle indicator is flawed? İt is like inverse fisherising MACD, correct?
The devil is in the details, thanks.
...
To avoid that "flat line" showing instead of showing "normal" value, un-check fixed minimum and maximum in the indicators properties and then you are going to get something like the second one on the picture.
The problem is simple : cyber cycle is not too good to be "inverse fisher-ised" - for symbols with values smaller then 100 (even then it is time frame dependable) it can not reach the extremes (+1 and -1 in this case) and since it is not a kind of oscillator as Stochastic and RSI are (with known minimum and maximums) I am not sure of the usefulness of doing the inverse fisher on cyber cycle indicator
Thank you Mladen, I have missed the point
Abhasfx
Hai all...
Anyone here is all masters..
I just newbie ....
Want to share something if maybe you have seen before...
This belkhayate sistem with perfect timing in...CCI Kino perfect setting from ABHAfsx but he did not want to share it.....
I just one to find the perfect indicator or setting that will show us the perfect entry of this repaint indicator from OAN System....
Me not good
Actually have some problem with cci kino's setting...
Not same on all pair and broker..
Thanks for helping....
There is a misunderstanding position here. He made a screnshot of a perfect position. It is not for all the time. Do not waste your time. A friend gave the setting before. Look at past posts.
Mesa8
Here is a help of MESA8 Ehlers indicators
MESA8 Add-On Help File
Does anybody has a code for BandPass indicator ??
Krzysztof