Multi Timeframe Indicators - page 488
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hi Mladen,
This indi works very well, but I have perhaps a stupid question:
The value of the %K and the %D is different if you are in timeframe one minutes or 15 minutes.
Do you think it's normal and due to the MTF ?
Thanks a lot
Zilliq
zilliq Here you go
Please make MTF
zigzagonparabolic.mq4
ThxHelp me ..please...Thank You
Hi Mladen,
This indi works very well, but I have perhaps a stupid question:
The value of the %K and the %D is different if you are in timeframe one minutes or 15 minutes.
Do you think it's normal and due to the MTF ?
Thanks a lot
ZilliqZilliq
That indicator does not use %D period (it is set to fixed 1). It only uses %K period
Thanks MLaden,
In fact I call %D the second line with the Sigma Period
But sorry, I don't understand, this morning I had 2 differents numbers in Timeframe 1 and 15, and at this time it is the same numbers
I don't know what it was wrong this morning
I will ask you if it comes back
Thanks a lot one more time and have a nice evening
Zilliq
Thanks MLaden,
In fact I call %D the second line with the Sigma Period
But sorry, I don't understand, this morning I had 2 differents numbers in Timeframe 1 and 15, and at this time it is the same numbers
I don't know what it was wrong this morning
I will ask you if it comes back
Thanks a lot one more time and have a nice evening
Zilliq
Zilliq
Seems that only now we are noticing some bugs with the newest metatrader builds. See this post too (I could not reproduce that one, but so far I have never seen something like that) : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/181280/page6
You can make it MTF ?
mig24.mq4
You can make it MTF ? mig24.mq4
popej30
Do you have the original (non-decompiled) source of that indicator?
not, only the source
You cant "improve" this indicator ?
not, only the source
The problem is that it (the source) is a decompiled source and I doubt that someone will work on such a code. That was the reason why I asked if you happen top have the original source of that indicator