Multi Timeframe Indicators - page 488

 

Hi Mladen,

This indi works very well, but I have perhaps a stupid question:

The value of the %K and the %D is different if you are in timeframe one minutes or 15 minutes.

Do you think it's normal and due to the MTF ?

Thanks a lot

Zilliq

mladen:
zilliq Here you go
 
niqcom:
Please make MTF

zigzagonparabolic.mq4

Thx

Help me ..please...Thank You

 
zilliq:
Hi Mladen,

This indi works very well, but I have perhaps a stupid question:

The value of the %K and the %D is different if you are in timeframe one minutes or 15 minutes.

Do you think it's normal and due to the MTF ?

Thanks a lot

Zilliq

Zilliq

That indicator does not use %D period (it is set to fixed 1). It only uses %K period

 

Thanks MLaden,

In fact I call %D the second line with the Sigma Period

But sorry, I don't understand, this morning I had 2 differents numbers in Timeframe 1 and 15, and at this time it is the same numbers

I don't know what it was wrong this morning

I will ask you if it comes back

Thanks a lot one more time and have a nice evening

Zilliq

Files:
 
zilliq:
Thanks MLaden,

In fact I call %D the second line with the Sigma Period

But sorry, I don't understand, this morning I had 2 differents numbers in Timeframe 1 and 15, and at this time it is the same numbers

I don't know what it was wrong this morning

I will ask you if it comes back

Thanks a lot one more time and have a nice evening

Zilliq

Zilliq

Seems that only now we are noticing some bugs with the newest metatrader builds. See this post too (I could not reproduce that one, but so far I have never seen something like that) : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/181280/page6

 

You can make it MTF ?

mig24.mq4

Files:
mig24.mq4  3 kb
 
popej30:
You can make it MTF ? mig24.mq4

popej30

Do you have the original (non-decompiled) source of that indicator?

 

not, only the source

 

You cant "improve" this indicator ?

 
popej30:
not, only the source

The problem is that it (the source) is a decompiled source and I doubt that someone will work on such a code. That was the reason why I asked if you happen top have the original source of that indicator