Discussion - page 19
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
hi newdigital
where i can find fire bird v0.65G , firebird v0.65G with time filter
because only i founded firebird v0.63G
and thanks very much about this site
hi newdigital
where i can find fire bird v0.65G , firebird v0.65G with time filter
because only i founded firebird v0.63G
and thanks very much about this siteYou may find firebird 0.65 in files' thread and in firebird's thread in this elite section.
But not 0.65G. I am not testing 0.65G. There is good thread in public forum about this "G".
Some threads about firebird in public forum is here https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/172915 and https://www.mql5.com/en/forum and https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/174234
And there is thread in this elite section.
where i can fin firebird v0.65G
thanks i wasn't see the answer
thanks i wasn't see the answer
I moved your question and my answer to the discussion thread here https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173397/page13
As additional to my reply:
- many firebird EAs: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173367/page13
- firebird thread in this elite section: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173367
hi new digital
first sorry bscause i am askin alot
second which one firebird with timefilter you r using in test and set his result every week
- Firebird with timefilter;
- with timefilter and without comments "Non-Trading Hours";
- anti-timefilter (EA which is not trading in selected hours);
- anti-timefilter without comments "Non-Trading Hours".
thanks
I am testing firebird and firebird with timefilter. Two EAs. Timefilter was adjusted to 8 - 17, North Finance server time.
BTW, Firebird did great profit this week. See weekly performance thread. Just posted results now.
I am testing firebird and firebird with timefilter. Two EAs. Timefilter was adjusted to 8 - 17, North Finance server time. BTW, Firebird did great profit this week. See weekly performance thread. Just posted results now.
thank you very much
realy very interesting results
but sorry i forgotto ask you r u using time frame m30
and make traillingstop true 15 point
thank you very much
realy very interesting results
but sorry i forgotto ask you r u using time frame m30
and make traillingstop true 15 pointM30 timeframe.
I am usiong pre-set file (it was posted to files' thread or to Firebird thread in elite section here).
I looked at the rades and lease find the following:
- image from MetaTrader with Goldwarrior. The deposit is below 50,000 because i traded many pairs but i reduced to 3 only now which is most profitable.
- statement from StepMAExpert_v1.42. Most profitable pairs are GBPJPY (+462 pips), USDJPY (+398 pips) and GBPUSD (+331).
- we have one MetaTrader with all Codersguru EAs testing . So please find the image from MetaTrader and detailed statements of all Codersguru's all together. Most profitable EAs:
- MAChannel for USDCHF (+1345 pips), EURUSD (+646 pips);
- PriceCross for USDCHF (+723 pips)
- and Xp_EMAs EA. This EA did +302 pips just for one and half week forward testing.
Greetings all, and NewDigital...
This question has to do with live data from brokers and it's use during trading demo/live. There was a post made by ND here, that stated:
...It is difficult even if you did forward test during the half a year or 1 year. Because sometimes the results (profit or losses) depends on the broker (broker's data).
My question is in my testing i went ahead and placed the GridMACD on a 1m chart and 1hr chart in two IBFX accounts and all is running well. My question is not related specificaly to the EA (which is running well) but rather what are the implications of using/running an EA on the 1m time frame verses the 1hour time frame from a purely technicalogical standpoint? Is it inherently more risky taking realtime data from the broker when looking at shorter timeframes?
I add the following only as a comment and insight; My 1m GM test in which i modified the MACD settings to 720,1560,9 so they mathmaticaly match the 60m chart's default EA-MACD settings of 12,26,9 are dramatic (PS, well "dramatic" for one day of trading!Haha). It appears just as "safe" but will close trades out in profit well before the 60m chart is. I've posted this later part over in the public GM thread in hopes that pengie will share some insights. The 1m has closed out 260+ pips in profit and the 1hr did not close the same trades, and they are now half of what they were in profit when the 1m closed them out hours ago. Strange. Might this be the finer price-detail of the 1m chart even though the MACD settings are mathmaticaly identical? Food for thought, but not my main point of this post...so i ramble.PS update,~30m after above post 1m GMMaxMACD as i call it closed out the swissy with 255+ pips. And though the 1hr has similar trades still open...they are just that...open. These are good profitable trades, so my thought is a pip in the bank is worth many more than those in float?
Cheers,
Thom
PS on Wed13th . . . only one trade initiated on the 1mMaxMACD today, but several on the standard 1hr. LOL. Go figure.