Observations of the Nina method - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hello Group,
More 200 pip today.. to be continued
The new rules:
Rules:
FT: M30
Indicators: IND Inverse +MA50
FX_Fisher
Stoch (5.3.3)
Buy: cross INDinverse+EMA50 (no reference mark) Stoch green line with the top of the red line and it must go up + Fx_fisher :it bar must be green and above reference mark 0
To close the order: with the crossing of the line of Stoch or TP = 15 or 20
Sell: inverse
For the sell, to see the reverse and the same for to close order
you must have the 3 indicators to validate the order at the same time
I continue has to follow the messages of the method original of NINA in order to find a better method of exit.
Bruno, so far no negative trades?
Would it be possible to post a summary of your trades each day and maybe charts for them sometimes too? thx
to BrunoFX
could you please attach your version of FX Fisher indicator. My Fisher changes color so often, that i don't know is it proper signal or not. And maybe you can add examples of your trades with charts.
Thanks
Hello Group, More 200 pip today.. to be continued
If you make some manual backtest your system is less profitable than nina and many false signal
hello Traders,
Bruno, so far no negative trades? Would it be possible to post a summary of your trades each day and maybe charts for them sometimes too? thx
I would try to make my to better put that to you, but I would have much work to leave D ela next week. I invite you to test this method as described above and you will tell us your comments
to BrunoFX
could you please attach your version of FX Fisher indicator. My Fisher changes color so often, that i don't know is it proper signal or not. And maybe you can add examples of your trades with charts.
ThanksI attach the indicator known this post
If you make some manual backtest your system is less profitable than nina and many false signal
This method results from the method of Nina and I manage to take trades before the signals of Nina. But it is true that with the CCI, we have at present less false signals.
Sorry but i think you dont understand what i try to tell you:)
I make some manual backtest and this system give more false signal than nina system
hello,
Trades really made manually (not hypothetical) :
(Gmt+1)
08h30 EURUSD, sold at 1.2075 --> 1.2053 = +22 pip
10h30 EURUSD, bought at 1.2073 --> 1.2075= +2 pip
14h30 EURUSD, bought at 1.2076 --> 1.2101= +25 pip
Total eurusd : +49 pip
10h30 USDCHF, sold at 1.2846--> 1.2837= +9 pip
14h30 USDCHF, sold at 1.2826--> 1.2815= +11 pip
Total usdchf : +20 pip
08h30 USDJPY, sold at 115.43 --> 115.20 = +23 pip
13h30 USDJPY, sold at 115.29 --> 115.03 = +26 pip
Total usdjpy : +49 pip
10h30 GBPUSD, bought at 1.7566 --> 1.7604 = +56 pip
Total gbpusd : +56 pip
Total : 174 pip
Sorry but i think you dont understand what i try to tell you:) I make some manual backtest and this system give more false signal than nina system
Indeed, I do not include/understand your question can be a mistranslation sorry. Please express your questions differently, thank you.
Bruno
Keep up the good work. I did a cursory manual backtest. It looks good to me.