Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3156
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Actually, Maxim wrote above that OOS does NOT work anywhere. It's just a naked overfitting. Just a little more and we will start to rejoice at the extraordinary results of optimisation in the tester.
I'm used to you reading things wrong all the time :)
Well, write down what you have to do point by point to make it clear, or code...
So write down what you need to do to make it clear, or code...
No, I want you to suffer learning python and the formulas in the book. Which are simple.
I don't think anyone's gonna go for that.
It's expensive, it's confusing.
I don't think anyone's gonna go for that.
A lot of expense, no clear result.
I'm sure there are bags on the R
Is that a quip?
You can check it out for yourself, I've developed a bit of a kozul theme so you don't get bored.
So your last graph shows the result of the script in the last article? https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/9138
You have not added a new function?
is that a joke?
So your last graph shows the result of the script in the last article? https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/9138
You didn't add a new function?
No
Packages are good, but first you need to understand in principle what you need to do.
chat response about kozuli methods
There are several methods that are used for causal inference. Some of the most common methods include:
These are just a few of the many methods that are used for causal inference. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of method depends on the particular situation and the data available.
tell us about point 1
Randomised controlled experiments, also known as randomised controlled trials (RCTs), are a powerful method for discovering causal relationships. In an RCT, participants are randomly divided into two or more groups. One group receives an intervention (such as a medication) and the other group receives a placebo or standard treatment. Researchers then compare the results between the groups to determine if there is a difference in outcomes.
The main advantage of RCT is that randomly assigning participants to groups helps eliminate bias and confounding. This means that any differences in outcomes between groups can be attributed to exposure rather than other factors.
However, RCTs are not always possible or practical. For example, they may be expensive, require a large amount of time and resources, or be ethically unacceptable. In these cases, researchers may use other methods of causal inference.
======================================
Are you doing this? It's a phyche selecta boruta by the looks of it.