|
8+ anni
esperienza
|
0
prodotti
|
0
versioni demo
|
|
0
lavori
|
1
segnali
|
195
iscritti
|
Sandis Smilts
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM
1
Sandis Smilts
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505
Good news, everyone!
After repeatedly bothering Admiral Markets team again and again, we received a call this morning – long story short, migration from UK will not be forced, their lawyers have found a way to continue maintaining operations there.
What this means for us:
• Starting Monday, 4th of December, all GRID setups will be fully restarted;
• Monthly PDF will be prepared and published till the 6th of December.
Don’t know about You, but we are stoked – the Portfolio is back, lets turn it up a notch! Will see what the final month of the Year will bring to us, but we do expect to end it on high note.
Cheers!
Sandis
Good news, everyone!
After repeatedly bothering Admiral Markets team again and again, we received a call this morning – long story short, migration from UK will not be forced, their lawyers have found a way to continue maintaining operations there.
What this means for us:
• Starting Monday, 4th of December, all GRID setups will be fully restarted;
• Monthly PDF will be prepared and published till the 6th of December.
Don’t know about You, but we are stoked – the Portfolio is back, lets turn it up a notch! Will see what the final month of the Year will bring to us, but we do expect to end it on high note.
Cheers!
Sandis
· 1
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Dear all, ALL GRID trades have been closed. As our floating is close to 0, this is one of the absolute best moments to unsubscribe from the Signal. There have been numerous of You all, who have openly criticized the decisions made by my team, as well as trading performance in general. Well, its Your time to shine -> look back at recent months, and decide for Yourself whether the taken decisions on our end, as well as our communication about the situation was up to Your standards. If, for some
1
Sandis Smilts
Hey all!
FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio has already 70 investors across MQL5 and Signalstart platforms - join the adventure and our hunt for pips! Link to the signal:
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505
Cheers!
Btw, You are more than welcome to join our Telegram group as well: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio
FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio has already 70 investors across MQL5 and Signalstart platforms - join the adventure and our hunt for pips! Link to the signal:
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505
Cheers!
Btw, You are more than welcome to join our Telegram group as well: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio
Sandis Smilts
The latest MQL5 Signals' ranking for August, 2023 has been published in this discussion group: https://t.me/FXSumoDiscussionGroup
Hope You will enjoy!
Sandis
Hope You will enjoy!
Sandis
· 1
Sandis Smilts
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505
Guys, its not always all-negative when it comes to interaction with subscribers.
Just today we received a package from one our oldest subscribers, which has been with us for more then 2 years. This individual has managed to withdraw all of his initial investment, and currently is operating with only profit-side of funds.
Although this person didn’t want to be mention by name, we can reveal that he is member of this discussion group.
Dear Friend, together with our team we will open one of these bottles of wine this evening, and drink for further long-lasting partnership with You – cheers and best of luck! 😉
Sandis
Guys, its not always all-negative when it comes to interaction with subscribers.
Just today we received a package from one our oldest subscribers, which has been with us for more then 2 years. This individual has managed to withdraw all of his initial investment, and currently is operating with only profit-side of funds.
Although this person didn’t want to be mention by name, we can reveal that he is member of this discussion group.
Dear Friend, together with our team we will open one of these bottles of wine this evening, and drink for further long-lasting partnership with You – cheers and best of luck! 😉
Sandis
Sandis Smilts
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505
Guys, we find ourselves in uneasy situation, thus, do want to address this.
During the last few months, we have publicly received multiple 1* reviews from our subscribers on MQL5. The reviews itself aren’t the main problem; the main problem is that, although recent Signal’s performance has been mediocre, the displayed results are in line with publicly expressed expectations and historical performance. Because of this, one might ask – based on what information does the decision to subscribe is being made by these people?
Let’s take Syed’s review as an example…
And before we point to the obvious, just food for thought -> we do understand the anger and frustration that Your 2.5k investment didn’t bring in the fortune You expected to generate, but, please, stop with the narcissistic behavior and statements like “i cant wait till the account got busted!”. Whatever the performance of this copying has been for You, hoping to see ~70 individuals with total pool of >1 mil. USD to go under because of this is… not normal, lets put it that way. 😉
With regards to other details – here, the person came in with 2.5k balance, and didn’t even realize that ~2% of that will be gone monthly due to fees. Signal’s monthly growth target is 3-5%, Syed here decided to come out swinging when DD was close to 9%, so… is this surprising to anyone? – where is any sort of due diligence from the subscriber? – both our recent drawdown and growth have been well in-between the historical limits, based on what information was the decision made to subscribe?! We have said again and again – we don’t rush to collect 30 USD from subscriber, keep that to Yourselves -> we much rather have subscribers that have clearly defined expectations of the Signal, then subscribers with gamblers’ mentality that first throw money in our Signal, and only then ask questions. And just to cement on this – we would be better-off without Your 90 USD paid for 3 months, then to deal with this review itself… But, hey, here we are. 😉
Just friendly reminder – we are being crucified this month for having 5% growth and 9% DD, when the publicly expressed goal is to have growth/DD relationship of 1:1 over 3-month period of time…
As we have close to 0 marketing/advertising efforts, most of our time is being spent answering questions of existing subscribers, providing in-depth analysis of trading performance and, generally, improving the life of current paying customers. In this case, whatever is being published by these customers in review section does effectively become our (or here, Your) indirect promotion of our Signal. And, again, we have no problems to face the criticism and back-clash, but seeing that for months that are not statistical outliers compared to overall history is… hard to digest, would that be the right phrase?
We are currently struggling to understand on where we should put our efforts – somehow, there is still tremendous proportion of people that cant seem to use the provided analysis in proper way. This inability leads to mislead and ill-considered investments, resulting in negative reviews, which tremendously slow down the growth of our subscribers’ base, as well as general interest in our Signal.
All in all, the general amount of public reviews is not sufficient – only 16 reviews out of 142 different individuals that have at any time followed the signal through MQL5. Currently, the general view about the Signal is super polarized – either there are 5* reviews from subs with 12 months+ experience with us or frustrating 1* reviews from people, which joined with undersized accounts and false expectations from the very beginning. From our perspective, its not all pure-black or pure-white, and we would love to see more fragmented take on our performance, as it’s the only way on how we can understand whether there is real demand for our services and where the possible improvements could come from. We strongly encourage everyone, who hasn’t reviewed our Signal yet, to do that in near future; on top of that, we expect You to update Your reviews (both positive or negative) as frequently as possible – this should strengthen the collaboration between us and the community.
Sandis
Guys, we find ourselves in uneasy situation, thus, do want to address this.
During the last few months, we have publicly received multiple 1* reviews from our subscribers on MQL5. The reviews itself aren’t the main problem; the main problem is that, although recent Signal’s performance has been mediocre, the displayed results are in line with publicly expressed expectations and historical performance. Because of this, one might ask – based on what information does the decision to subscribe is being made by these people?
Let’s take Syed’s review as an example…
And before we point to the obvious, just food for thought -> we do understand the anger and frustration that Your 2.5k investment didn’t bring in the fortune You expected to generate, but, please, stop with the narcissistic behavior and statements like “i cant wait till the account got busted!”. Whatever the performance of this copying has been for You, hoping to see ~70 individuals with total pool of >1 mil. USD to go under because of this is… not normal, lets put it that way. 😉
With regards to other details – here, the person came in with 2.5k balance, and didn’t even realize that ~2% of that will be gone monthly due to fees. Signal’s monthly growth target is 3-5%, Syed here decided to come out swinging when DD was close to 9%, so… is this surprising to anyone? – where is any sort of due diligence from the subscriber? – both our recent drawdown and growth have been well in-between the historical limits, based on what information was the decision made to subscribe?! We have said again and again – we don’t rush to collect 30 USD from subscriber, keep that to Yourselves -> we much rather have subscribers that have clearly defined expectations of the Signal, then subscribers with gamblers’ mentality that first throw money in our Signal, and only then ask questions. And just to cement on this – we would be better-off without Your 90 USD paid for 3 months, then to deal with this review itself… But, hey, here we are. 😉
Just friendly reminder – we are being crucified this month for having 5% growth and 9% DD, when the publicly expressed goal is to have growth/DD relationship of 1:1 over 3-month period of time…
As we have close to 0 marketing/advertising efforts, most of our time is being spent answering questions of existing subscribers, providing in-depth analysis of trading performance and, generally, improving the life of current paying customers. In this case, whatever is being published by these customers in review section does effectively become our (or here, Your) indirect promotion of our Signal. And, again, we have no problems to face the criticism and back-clash, but seeing that for months that are not statistical outliers compared to overall history is… hard to digest, would that be the right phrase?
We are currently struggling to understand on where we should put our efforts – somehow, there is still tremendous proportion of people that cant seem to use the provided analysis in proper way. This inability leads to mislead and ill-considered investments, resulting in negative reviews, which tremendously slow down the growth of our subscribers’ base, as well as general interest in our Signal.
All in all, the general amount of public reviews is not sufficient – only 16 reviews out of 142 different individuals that have at any time followed the signal through MQL5. Currently, the general view about the Signal is super polarized – either there are 5* reviews from subs with 12 months+ experience with us or frustrating 1* reviews from people, which joined with undersized accounts and false expectations from the very beginning. From our perspective, its not all pure-black or pure-white, and we would love to see more fragmented take on our performance, as it’s the only way on how we can understand whether there is real demand for our services and where the possible improvements could come from. We strongly encourage everyone, who hasn’t reviewed our Signal yet, to do that in near future; on top of that, we expect You to update Your reviews (both positive or negative) as frequently as possible – this should strengthen the collaboration between us and the community.
Sandis
SYED HUSSNAIN AMEER
2023.07.25
That is real review, and the stats ! if you cant bear the review please do not post signal for public ! this is real review and i've lost over $700 in almost last almost 5 months ! i have right to leave true review, ! Stop asking people to send me personal messages about review n explanation etc !
Sandis Smilts
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM! Sandis
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM
1
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM
1
Sandis Smilts
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM! Sandis
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Guys, there is new simulation file added in telegram group https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio about FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio Signal where potential subscriber can simulate last 6-month performance with his own copying setup! If You have any other questions, feel free to approach me via PM! Cheers! Sandis
1
Sandis Smilts
Guys, there is new simulation file added in telegram group https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio about FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) where potential subscriber can simulate last 6-month performance with his own copying setup!
If You have any other questions, feel free to approach me via PM!
Cheers!
Sandis
If You have any other questions, feel free to approach me via PM!
Cheers!
Sandis
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM! Sandis
1
Sandis Smilts
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal (https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/723505) are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM! Sandis
Sandis Smilts
The newest ranking of close to 1000 MQL5 signals available on this telegram group:
https://t.me/FXSumoDiscussionGroup
https://t.me/FXSumoDiscussionGroup
· 1
Sandis Smilts
The newest ranking of close to 1000 MQL5 signals available on this telegram group:
https://t.me/FXSumoDiscussionGroup
https://t.me/FXSumoDiscussionGroup
Sandis Smilts
Novità riguardo FX SUMO Diversified Portfolio il segnale
Self-evaluation and updates about the Signal for full-year 2022 are available on PDF published in this telegram group: https://t.me/FXSUMODiversifiedPortfolio If there are any questions, feel free to approach me via PM! Sandis
1