|
4 anni
esperienza
|
4
prodotti
|
3460
versioni demo
|
|
0
lavori
|
4
segnali
|
0
iscritti
|
Maker of Winners
al
Trading
I don't sell dreams, shortcuts, or nonsense. If you're still losing money in the market, the problem isn't the bots or the charts—it's you. But don't worry, we don't judge here; we fix.
📈 ALL OUR SIGNALS: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/author/envex
🤖 ALL OUR EXPERT ADVISORS: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
⚠️ NEW MQL5 GROUP: https://www.mql5.com/en/messages/01c72081307dda01
🔵 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/+Jwdm825813I1Nzk0
If you feel that you don't know even the most basic things, start here: https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/761104
📈 ALL OUR SIGNALS: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/author/envex
🤖 ALL OUR EXPERT ADVISORS: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
⚠️ NEW MQL5 GROUP: https://www.mql5.com/en/messages/01c72081307dda01
🔵 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/+Jwdm825813I1Nzk0
If you feel that you don't know even the most basic things, start here: https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/761104
Enrique Enguix
## Correlation Analysis of Currency Pairs for Multi-Symbol Strategy
A correlation analysis was conducted on 17 symbols to identify the combination of pairs with the lowest correlation, aiming to improve the strategy’s stability and diversification.
### Analysis Details:
- Symbol Subset: 3 pairs
- Timeframe: Daily (D1)
- Bars Analyzed: 1300 (approximately 5 years of data)
- Combinations Generated: 680
### Best Combination Found (with the lowest average correlation):
- AUDUSD
- USDCHF
- EURGBP
The average correlation between these pairs is 0.1071, indicating low correlation. This is essential for a multi-symbol strategy, as low correlation reduces the risk of simultaneous losses due to market-wide movements, enhancing overall stability and drawdown control.
This type of analysis is fundamental for building more robust and diversified trading systems.
A correlation analysis was conducted on 17 symbols to identify the combination of pairs with the lowest correlation, aiming to improve the strategy’s stability and diversification.
### Analysis Details:
- Symbol Subset: 3 pairs
- Timeframe: Daily (D1)
- Bars Analyzed: 1300 (approximately 5 years of data)
- Combinations Generated: 680
### Best Combination Found (with the lowest average correlation):
- AUDUSD
- USDCHF
- EURGBP
The average correlation between these pairs is 0.1071, indicating low correlation. This is essential for a multi-symbol strategy, as low correlation reduces the risk of simultaneous losses due to market-wide movements, enhancing overall stability and drawdown control.
This type of analysis is fundamental for building more robust and diversified trading systems.
· 1
Enrique Enguix
⚠️ When the market turns ugly, suddenly everyone remembers God.
"Please, let the price bounce."
"Let this trade avoid the stop loss."
"Let the trend reverse."
But when things go well, then it’s all:
"I know what I’m doing."
"It’s my strategy."
"It’s my discipline."
Funny, isn’t it?
The truth is, the market doesn’t work on miracles. It works on numbers, risk management, and a solid plan.
If every time you open a trade you need to pray that it doesn’t go against you… maybe you’re not managing risk—just gambling with faith.
And for that, there are casinos.
Do whatever you want, but the market doesn’t forgive those who trade with their fingers crossed.
If you want to avoid praying to God to fix your trading: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
"Please, let the price bounce."
"Let this trade avoid the stop loss."
"Let the trend reverse."
But when things go well, then it’s all:
"I know what I’m doing."
"It’s my strategy."
"It’s my discipline."
Funny, isn’t it?
The truth is, the market doesn’t work on miracles. It works on numbers, risk management, and a solid plan.
If every time you open a trade you need to pray that it doesn’t go against you… maybe you’re not managing risk—just gambling with faith.
And for that, there are casinos.
Do whatever you want, but the market doesn’t forgive those who trade with their fingers crossed.
If you want to avoid praying to God to fix your trading: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
· 1
Enrique Enguix
As you already know, I'm always researching. This week, I revisited the topic of patterns, both for confirming entries and validating the grid.
In the image, I'm testing a confirmation pattern to open the grid. What do we see? On the left, the results when we use the pattern. On the right, when we don't.
The conclusion is quite clear: there are no significant differences. I'm testing over a very long period to ensure a solid statistical base, and after several hours of testing different patterns, the result is the same:
➡️ They don’t improve entries.
➡️ They don’t improve the grid.
So, there's no point in adding more variables to the system if they don’t provide real value.
By the way, I’m also rewriting the NEXUS code. Why? Because I need it to be as efficient as possible to test the neural network I have ready.
This isn’t a quick change; it's a full-time job that will take several weeks. And yes, that means NEXUS purchase conditions will change in the future, though if you already own it, this won’t affect you at all.
We keep moving forward. 🚀
In the image, I'm testing a confirmation pattern to open the grid. What do we see? On the left, the results when we use the pattern. On the right, when we don't.
The conclusion is quite clear: there are no significant differences. I'm testing over a very long period to ensure a solid statistical base, and after several hours of testing different patterns, the result is the same:
➡️ They don’t improve entries.
➡️ They don’t improve the grid.
So, there's no point in adding more variables to the system if they don’t provide real value.
By the way, I’m also rewriting the NEXUS code. Why? Because I need it to be as efficient as possible to test the neural network I have ready.
This isn’t a quick change; it's a full-time job that will take several weeks. And yes, that means NEXUS purchase conditions will change in the future, though if you already own it, this won’t affect you at all.
We keep moving forward. 🚀
· 1
Enrique Enguix
In the image above you can see an AXIS (https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/126781) signal. I just want to focus on the distribution of trades: 570 for EUR/USD, 97 for AUD/USD, 53 for GBP/USD. The profits are also distributed more or less proportionally. ($725 EUR/USD, $145 AUD/USD and $59 GBP/USD)
P.S.: AXIS profits for EUR/USD are 7 times higher than NODE profits for EUR/USD
09:58
I want to know what you think, what decision would you make?
1. I would leave it as it is now (diversification)
2. I would increase the lot size a bit on AUD/USD and GBP/USD
3. I lack data to make a decision
4. I would leave the EA running only on EUR/USD
P.S.: AXIS profits for EUR/USD are 7 times higher than NODE profits for EUR/USD
09:58
I want to know what you think, what decision would you make?
1. I would leave it as it is now (diversification)
2. I would increase the lot size a bit on AUD/USD and GBP/USD
3. I lack data to make a decision
4. I would leave the EA running only on EUR/USD
· 1
Enrique Enguix
🔥 "AXIS and LINK are correlated, so they’re useless..."
That’s what some say. Funny thing is, those who truly understand the market know that correlation, when managed correctly, isn’t a problem… it’s an advantage.
Because here, we don’t throw things together randomly. This isn’t a guessing game—it’s a carefully designed strategy that leverages every connection to maximize opportunities and minimize risks.
📌 If you think “correlation = problem,” you need to see this:
🔗 [The strategy behind the correlation (ENGLISH)] https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/761134
🔗 [Why AXIS and LINK are designed this way (SPANISH)] https://www.mql5.com/es/blogs/post/761133
The ones who get it, get it. Do you? 🚀....
.
I'm sorry that some of you don't like reading this stuff. I don't care. This is who I am: a real trader and a researcher. I'm not here just for the sake of selling. Selling allows me to keep improving for myself and for you.
That’s what some say. Funny thing is, those who truly understand the market know that correlation, when managed correctly, isn’t a problem… it’s an advantage.
Because here, we don’t throw things together randomly. This isn’t a guessing game—it’s a carefully designed strategy that leverages every connection to maximize opportunities and minimize risks.
📌 If you think “correlation = problem,” you need to see this:
🔗 [The strategy behind the correlation (ENGLISH)] https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/761134
🔗 [Why AXIS and LINK are designed this way (SPANISH)] https://www.mql5.com/es/blogs/post/761133
The ones who get it, get it. Do you? 🚀....
.
I'm sorry that some of you don't like reading this stuff. I don't care. This is who I am: a real trader and a researcher. I'm not here just for the sake of selling. Selling allows me to keep improving for myself and for you.
· 3
Enrique Enguix
Years ago, a friend got lost in the mountains.
He set off confidently, perfect weather, GPS on his phone. Everything was fine… until night fell and his battery died.
No GPS, no flashlight, no jacket.
He survived because they found him the next morning. But he spent the night terrified, stuck in place, realizing too late that in the mountains, the biggest mistake is not being prepared for the worst.
Trading is the same.
Most traders chase the "most profitable" EA, as if that’s what really matters. But the only thing that truly matters is survival.
Because if you survive, you stay in the game. And if you stay in the game, profits will come.
That’s why NODE exists.
It’s not another bot with a beautiful backtest curve that collapses in real conditions. It’s built to manage risk, filter out false signals, and withstand the market when things get rough.
And that’s why it’s been the most popular free EA for weeks.
Because traders who last in the market understand one thing: the goal isn’t to win fast, it’s to stay alive long enough to win for real.
Download NODE for free and stop walking blind in the market. https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/126605
He set off confidently, perfect weather, GPS on his phone. Everything was fine… until night fell and his battery died.
No GPS, no flashlight, no jacket.
He survived because they found him the next morning. But he spent the night terrified, stuck in place, realizing too late that in the mountains, the biggest mistake is not being prepared for the worst.
Trading is the same.
Most traders chase the "most profitable" EA, as if that’s what really matters. But the only thing that truly matters is survival.
Because if you survive, you stay in the game. And if you stay in the game, profits will come.
That’s why NODE exists.
It’s not another bot with a beautiful backtest curve that collapses in real conditions. It’s built to manage risk, filter out false signals, and withstand the market when things get rough.
And that’s why it’s been the most popular free EA for weeks.
Because traders who last in the market understand one thing: the goal isn’t to win fast, it’s to stay alive long enough to win for real.
Download NODE for free and stop walking blind in the market. https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/126605
· 2
Enrique Enguix
🚀 4 EAs, 10 Active Signals, 14 Weeks of Results
📈 €6,452 + $471 in accumulated profits.
And before you say it… NO, this is not a magic bot or a gambling strategy.
✅ We achieved this with NODE, AXIS, LINK, and NEXUS EA.
Each one designed for a different level of automated trading.
📊 From the free NODE to the powerhouse NEXUS, featuring 9 integrated strategies and advanced risk management.
The question isn’t whether it works. It’s whether you’ll be in when it keeps growing.
📈 €6,452 + $471 in accumulated profits.
And before you say it… NO, this is not a magic bot or a gambling strategy.
✅ We achieved this with NODE, AXIS, LINK, and NEXUS EA.
Each one designed for a different level of automated trading.
📊 From the free NODE to the powerhouse NEXUS, featuring 9 integrated strategies and advanced risk management.
The question isn’t whether it works. It’s whether you’ll be in when it keeps growing.
· 2
Enrique Enguix
🔥 The biggest mistake when optimizing a trading bot: thinking that more adjustments = more profits. And yes, it can cost you dearly…
Many believe that if a bot fits perfectly to past data, it will perform well in the future. Wrong. What looks like a Ferrari in backtesting can turn into a tricycle with square wheels in live trading.
1️⃣ Backtesting: Checking how a bot would have performed in the past. Useful, but not enough.
2️⃣ Optimization: Tweaking parameters to improve results. This can be gold… or a deadly trap.
3️⃣ Over-optimization: When you fine-tune the bot so much that it looks unbeatable in historical data, but crashes in real trading. Like memorizing test answers instead of understanding the material.
That's why good optimization isn’t about overfitting, but finding settings that can survive in the future.
In LINK, we avoid over-optimization with a serious, methodical, and brutal process:
✅ Segmenting different periods to check for consistency. If a bot only works in one specific timeframe, it’s doomed.
✅ Forward testing to see how it performs in unseen market conditions. Because if it doesn’t survive outside of backtests, it’s worthless.
✅ Re-verification in real conditions, no tricks. No magic optimizations that only shine in historical data.
✅ Backtesting on synthetic symbols, modifying market conditions to test how the bot adapts to unpredictable scenarios.
✅ Pure torture: Express slippage, latency, extreme conditions. If the bot survives this, it can trade anywhere.
To give you an idea: 45 hours of preliminary optimization on LINK with 32 processors + a farm of another 32. Because doing it right isn’t just pressing a button and hoping for miracles—it’s a serious process.
If you want me to talk more about this and how you can apply it to your trading, hit the like button on this post.
Because backtesting doesn’t pay the bills. A well-optimized bot does.
Many believe that if a bot fits perfectly to past data, it will perform well in the future. Wrong. What looks like a Ferrari in backtesting can turn into a tricycle with square wheels in live trading.
1️⃣ Backtesting: Checking how a bot would have performed in the past. Useful, but not enough.
2️⃣ Optimization: Tweaking parameters to improve results. This can be gold… or a deadly trap.
3️⃣ Over-optimization: When you fine-tune the bot so much that it looks unbeatable in historical data, but crashes in real trading. Like memorizing test answers instead of understanding the material.
That's why good optimization isn’t about overfitting, but finding settings that can survive in the future.
In LINK, we avoid over-optimization with a serious, methodical, and brutal process:
✅ Segmenting different periods to check for consistency. If a bot only works in one specific timeframe, it’s doomed.
✅ Forward testing to see how it performs in unseen market conditions. Because if it doesn’t survive outside of backtests, it’s worthless.
✅ Re-verification in real conditions, no tricks. No magic optimizations that only shine in historical data.
✅ Backtesting on synthetic symbols, modifying market conditions to test how the bot adapts to unpredictable scenarios.
✅ Pure torture: Express slippage, latency, extreme conditions. If the bot survives this, it can trade anywhere.
To give you an idea: 45 hours of preliminary optimization on LINK with 32 processors + a farm of another 32. Because doing it right isn’t just pressing a button and hoping for miracles—it’s a serious process.
If you want me to talk more about this and how you can apply it to your trading, hit the like button on this post.
Because backtesting doesn’t pay the bills. A well-optimized bot does.
· 3
Enrique Enguix
# Do You Want a Trading Bot That Looks Like a Work of Art or One That Won’t Blow Up Your Account in Three Weeks?
Because, look, we could make our backtests look flawless.
We could show you a profit curve so perfect it would seem designed by a Swiss engineer with OCD.
But there’s a problem: it would be a lie.
Making a bot look profitable in the past is easy.
You feed it data from 2020 to 2025, tweak it until everything shines, and voilà: you’ve got a money-making machine…
that in real trading leaves you staring at your screen while your account burns.
Because the market doesn’t follow your optimized rules.
It does whatever the hell it wants.
### We do things differently:
✅ We optimize on 2020-2022.
✅ Then we throw it at data the bot has never seen (2022-2024). If it holds up, we’re onto something.
✅ Finally, we send it to the slaughterhouse: 2024-2025, with slippage, horrible spreads, and brutal conditions.
If after all that it still works, then you’ve got a real bot.
### The result?
Its backtest won’t be a smooth highway.
It won’t have an Instagram-worthy dream curve.
But it also won’t wipe you out when you run it live.
So, what’s it gonna be?
A pretty chart? Or a bot that can take the market’s punches?
Think fast.
The market won’t wait.
AXIS $249 | LINK $649 | NEXUS $1799
https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
Because, look, we could make our backtests look flawless.
We could show you a profit curve so perfect it would seem designed by a Swiss engineer with OCD.
But there’s a problem: it would be a lie.
Making a bot look profitable in the past is easy.
You feed it data from 2020 to 2025, tweak it until everything shines, and voilà: you’ve got a money-making machine…
that in real trading leaves you staring at your screen while your account burns.
Because the market doesn’t follow your optimized rules.
It does whatever the hell it wants.
### We do things differently:
✅ We optimize on 2020-2022.
✅ Then we throw it at data the bot has never seen (2022-2024). If it holds up, we’re onto something.
✅ Finally, we send it to the slaughterhouse: 2024-2025, with slippage, horrible spreads, and brutal conditions.
If after all that it still works, then you’ve got a real bot.
### The result?
Its backtest won’t be a smooth highway.
It won’t have an Instagram-worthy dream curve.
But it also won’t wipe you out when you run it live.
So, what’s it gonna be?
A pretty chart? Or a bot that can take the market’s punches?
Think fast.
The market won’t wait.
AXIS $249 | LINK $649 | NEXUS $1799
https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
· 2
Enrique Enguix
“I’m going to make easy money with trading.”
Yeah, sure. And I’m going to win a Nobel Prize for writing this.
Look, every newbie trader follows the same ridiculous path:
1️⃣ They see some guy on YouTube with a rented Lamborghini. They get excited. Open an account. Think they’ll double their money in a week.
2️⃣ They start trading with the same strategy a chimpanzee with a coin would use. Win one, lose four. They start doubting.
3️⃣ They search YouTube. Find a guru with a “foolproof strategy.” Try it. Lose more. Switch strategies. Repeat the cycle.
4️⃣ They give up and buy a magic robot that promises to make them rich effortlessly. It works for a bit. Then blows up their account.
5️⃣ They decide the only way to win is to bet bigger. Add more money to “recover.” Guess what happens.
6️⃣ Last attempt with a decent system. They win. Get excited. Increase risk. One bad streak and *BAM!* Account wiped.
7️⃣ They get frustrated. Blame the market, the banks, the Fed, their grandma. And quit.
What went wrong?
They never understood the game. No patience, no education, no risk management. They looked for shortcuts until they ran out of road.
Trading can be profitable. But not for those who believe in fairy tales.
If you want to follow the steps of someone who has been on this path for years, click the link: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
If you prefer to keep believing those who tell you how things are done but don’t actually do them… then go back to step one.
Yeah, sure. And I’m going to win a Nobel Prize for writing this.
Look, every newbie trader follows the same ridiculous path:
1️⃣ They see some guy on YouTube with a rented Lamborghini. They get excited. Open an account. Think they’ll double their money in a week.
2️⃣ They start trading with the same strategy a chimpanzee with a coin would use. Win one, lose four. They start doubting.
3️⃣ They search YouTube. Find a guru with a “foolproof strategy.” Try it. Lose more. Switch strategies. Repeat the cycle.
4️⃣ They give up and buy a magic robot that promises to make them rich effortlessly. It works for a bit. Then blows up their account.
5️⃣ They decide the only way to win is to bet bigger. Add more money to “recover.” Guess what happens.
6️⃣ Last attempt with a decent system. They win. Get excited. Increase risk. One bad streak and *BAM!* Account wiped.
7️⃣ They get frustrated. Blame the market, the banks, the Fed, their grandma. And quit.
What went wrong?
They never understood the game. No patience, no education, no risk management. They looked for shortcuts until they ran out of road.
Trading can be profitable. But not for those who believe in fairy tales.
If you want to follow the steps of someone who has been on this path for years, click the link: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
If you prefer to keep believing those who tell you how things are done but don’t actually do them… then go back to step one.
· 3
Enrique Enguix
The Market Doesn’t Hate You… But It Doesn’t Love You Either
Yesterday, someone told me: "The market hates me, I always lose."
Listen, the market doesn’t even know you exist. It’s not watching you. It’s not laughing at your trades. It just does what it does.
While you complain, others are learning its rules and making money.
✅ If you trade without a strategy, you’ll get wiped out.
✅ If you're obsessed with recovering losses, you're digging your own grave.
✅ If you think you can predict the next move… you might as well buy a crystal ball.
It’s not luck. It’s not magic. It’s method. It’s control.
So, what’s it going to be? Keep whining or start trading with an edge?
If it’s the latter, start here: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
Yesterday, someone told me: "The market hates me, I always lose."
Listen, the market doesn’t even know you exist. It’s not watching you. It’s not laughing at your trades. It just does what it does.
While you complain, others are learning its rules and making money.
✅ If you trade without a strategy, you’ll get wiped out.
✅ If you're obsessed with recovering losses, you're digging your own grave.
✅ If you think you can predict the next move… you might as well buy a crystal ball.
It’s not luck. It’s not magic. It’s method. It’s control.
So, what’s it going to be? Keep whining or start trading with an edge?
If it’s the latter, start here: https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
· 2
Enrique Enguix
Four Levels, One Goal: Master the Market
🤖 NODE: The perfect starting point for beginners. A simple, reliable strategy to dive into automated trading without hassle.
🤖 AXIS: For traders with some experience. Diversifies across three currency pairs with advanced strategies and optimized risk management.
🤖 LINK: Total coverage in eight markets. Perfect for intermediates looking to trade with precision and maximize results.
🤖 NEXUS: Absolute power for advanced traders. Nine strategies in one tool designed to dominate any market.
Start where you are. Level up when you're ready:
https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
🤖 NODE: The perfect starting point for beginners. A simple, reliable strategy to dive into automated trading without hassle.
🤖 AXIS: For traders with some experience. Diversifies across three currency pairs with advanced strategies and optimized risk management.
🤖 LINK: Total coverage in eight markets. Perfect for intermediates looking to trade with precision and maximize results.
🤖 NEXUS: Absolute power for advanced traders. Nine strategies in one tool designed to dominate any market.
Start where you are. Level up when you're ready:
https://www.mql5.com/en/users/envex/seller
· 2