Hercules AI

It is a good EA, but dont play with the working times. If you let the EA work from 0-24h than it will bring in losing trades. Let the it work between 6-9h and 13-19h.

I have been running EA for more than 5 months, the results are very good. Although there are sometimes stop loss orders, EA has recovered very quickly in just 1-2 weeks.

Real Signal: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2240687?source=Site+Signals+MT5+Tile+All+Search%3aXAU

I don't think this EA is bad at all. If it was bad, I wouldn't update it and would leave it alone. Also, I don't think it's an all-purpose EA, just as there are markets it's good at and markets it's bad at. I believe in this EA because it's produced results in the long term.

It’s a shame to see Hercules being review bombed. The last month on gold has been wild with new all time highs, Middle East, trump etc all you have to do is look at the change in volume I have been using Hercules since April on a large account, with a very low risk setting and recovery mode and I have made good profits which are inline with the real signal Some reviews state that they have lost their capital in two trades… ridiculous to be running an EA at such massive risk. As with any other EA, it is only as good as the users savvy in making the decision to turn it off in unexpected trading scenarios I turned off Hercules after gold touch it’s all time high and have now had 3 profits trades now that the volatility has reduced. Ask the author for the set file for your time zone and use it over a two month period with a sensible risk setting No one is going to become a millionaire in 6months using maximum risk on a £1000 account. Be sensible

I think this EA works, the thing is the number of deals and lot size if left to users, it will be better. Every EA has a loss period, hercules had it this month.Will add more reviews after some time

499租的EA，现在全价499。看来作者已经放弃这个EA了。还好我早就弃用它了。万幸啊。

I rented EA for 499, now the full price is 499. It seems that the author has given up on this EA. Fortunately, I no longer need it.

Give me a refund of $999, I don't want to use your EA, does that deserve expert level?

This EA (dont know if I can all it even an advisor) destroyed my whole capital in two trades. It was initially doing good, but then two consequent SL hitting trades wiped out the entire account. Just trying to be happy about the fact that I just rented it for 3 months, and didnt buy it.Developer has to really think about the risk-reward ratio, where the current setting is really dangerous.

The EA Destroyed my whole account in 2 trades was doing really well initially, but after 2 months of using it, blew the original balance and the profits that it made dont recommend to get it

I've lost more money now and wiped my profit. Will temporarily halt this algo until the developer fixes it.

excelent in backtest. bullshit in live. Small profits never cover the huge loses

Hope Aleksandr can fix this ea in the future , I’m with high hopes before I bought this. Aleksandr don’t just show your signal is profiting , we are not blind , you just changed to fixed lots before these huge loss happen , just fix this ea

I lost a lot of money in the first month of purchasing EA. I have a lot of problems because I have never made a profit... I am dissatisfied. I have too much ST loss. There is no TP profit. Now I have a lot of losses. It is the worst!!!

I have been using the EA for several months now. At first the results were not good because my broker had a different schedule than Hercules. Aleksandr was always willing to answer my questions and helped me solve the error. However, even though I use one of the brokers that Aleksandr uses (ICM) and the same VPS, not all the entries that appear in its trading history open trades for me. It opens several of those that are going to stop loss, so I am not generating significant profits. I think that the Hercules backtest is very optimized and differs from reality. I hope Aleksandr can correct these errors in future versions. If the EA improves in the future I will update my opinion and my rating.

I am updating my comment and rating. After 2 months a bill of 10 thousand dollars was reduced to 827 dollars.

the results did not good as the backtest

Unfortunately, I must agree with the other negative reviews. I thoroughly backtested the EA before purchasing, had high hopes for it and started seeing smaller positive results but didn't realize that the risk-to-reward ratio was so low. I have been actively using the default settings of the EA all this time, low risk profile, 1-2% risk, and it has a 70 pip TP and 400 pip stop loss in hopes that it reverses at some point. What that means is that I have gone into drawdown more times than not and are forced to intervene sometimes as the EA will sell the very bottom of a buying trend, and buy the top of a sell trend. I have come to realize its best to probably reverse copy trade the EA as its great at catching the bottom and top of the opposite trend. The author will likely say he has doubts this is a competitor review but idk how that's true really. I have recorded various screenshots and journals via Tradezella showcasing this. I was using the default settings and as Ponnuvel Pandian and others have said, you have to turn it off eventually. The recovery of that loss if the bot loses will take a long time. For example, risking $150 per trade, with default settings the EA targets for a $26 TP and $150 SL. Great backtest, not so great real world results. Aleksandr should consider learning how to take critical feedback of his paying customers, modifying the EA to trade the opposite direction and showcase the new results.

EDIT: 7/31/24 — as expected Aleksandr has responded defensively like he does to all his customers. Not taking the feedback, just deflecting and calling them competitors which is silly. Which EA am I selling and where? I'm going to spend hundreds of dollars buying the thing just to leave a negative feedback in hopes someone doesn't buy it from you? Here's my order number: #13126081 Aleksandr. Fix the EA! It's also a red flag when the developer calls a risk-to-reward ratio "nonsense". If you call simple math nonsense, you have a bigger problem in life. Statistically, any trading strategy that has a high win rate but a low RRR will eventually wipe your account. Having a 0.10 or 0.25RRR (not a 1:1, or 1:2, or 1:3) is foolishness and as someone else said "not anything to do with seriousness". Maybe share a set file that reflects what you're posting in the signal? Because other people who purchased this are not seeing the same results.

Don't fall for the "AI" branding in the name, it's not AI anything unless AI means "absent intelligence".

From the day 1 I bought this EA, I have lost about 5K due to this EA. It gives very good results in the back test but with the same settings it loses all money in a real account. And I see the author responds to all negative reviews as he has doubt as it can be a competitor review. I don't know why he responds like this. Instead, he should resolve the issues and improve the EA. The default stop loss is more than 6 times the TP. So, you need at least 7 to 8 TPs to overcome 1 loss. But in reality, it profits about 2 to 3 trades and losses again. So, it puts us in loosing position always. Author should accept the criticism and work on the improvement instead of blaming the customers' reviews as doubtful competitor reviews.

I stopped using this EA long time ago on my real account, the wins are small and losses are big. You think this will grow your account? No EA is safe in the gold market, and this R:R setup won't get you far! Aleksandr stop Gaslighting the users!! You are a bad person, everybody bought your EA, you did NOT give it out for free, therefore they have the right to criticize your POS ea. You know exactly what you are doing and some one with a bit of common sense can also see that you are changing the lot size (your live signal) based on your assumptions of the gold market directions and volatility. If you were to maintain the exact lot size from the start you won't have such a big mouth! 1 Star!

Unfortunately I had to rewrite my review because the devs needs to get this EA into hands. It almost wiped out my 1000$ deposit good thing I stopped it. The EA seemed to work great until it had to make a loss. I am not saying the EA is not making profit it is doing it but it wipes it out. As stated by another consumer of this EA it enters right at the end of the current trend and for that there is just not enough volume in that direction anymore. The dev should really take action to prove his EA is good, first thing is lowering that sl.

Update: After discussing with the author and looking at the live signal and the backtests, this EA is legit. I use the recovery enabled with a factor of 3 and a risk of 5 and it is almost like in the live signal. The loss that occurred now has been recovered, but ONLY WITH THE RECOVERY MODE ON!. The author should update the default settings, but anyway, those who left a bad review don't know how to trade.