Shouldn't MQL5 Community close the loopholes in presentation of Signals' performance?

[Zilong Chen]

MQL5 community has presented, still present, a lot of Signal providers to potential customers. Demand for profitable Signals at the MQL5 community is huge, obviously. However, The MQL5 community site presents Signals' performance in a wrong method, for example, over 1,000% growth in 58 weeks. When you spend five minutes calculating the growth rate by yourself, the growth rate is a lot less than MQL5 community's one. There are so many cases in the site.  That's a loophole or misleading?

[Alain Verleyen]

How is the Growth in Signals Calculated?