You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
These are desires for information, but not properties
Information is the transmission and receipt of knowledge, facts, data and messages between a sender and a receiver that may have meaning or significance for the receiver or society at large. However, the definition of information can be multifaceted and contextual and can have different meaning and value in different domains and contexts. Information can be available or unavailable from a variety of reasons, and understanding what information is and how to use it depends on the scope and context.
(AI.)
Evaluating and utilising information, as I understand it, refers to making decisions and acting on the knowledge gained. However, in order to gain this knowledge, it is necessary to first convert data into information and interpret it to find out its meaning and context.
Thus, in interpreting information, it is important not only to evaluate and understand the facts, but also to use this understanding to make appropriate decisions and determine the actions to be taken in a particular context. Therefore, it can be said that information interpretation is an integral part of the process of transforming data into knowledge that can be realised in the form of practical decisions and actions.
(AI).
Evaluating and utilising information, as I understand it, refers to making decisions and acting on the knowledge gained. However, in order to gain this knowledge, one must first convert data into information and interpret it to find out its meaning and context.
Thus, in interpreting information, it is important not only to evaluate and understand the facts, but also to use this understanding to make appropriate decisions and determine the actions to be taken in a particular context. Therefore, we can say that information interpretation is an integral part of the process of transforming data into knowledge that can be realised in the form of practical decisions and actions.
there are cases where humans have solved previously unsolvable problems just because they thought it was an ordinary problem....
you need to make chatogepete-like creatures think that they are living beings. you need to put them on a planet with continents, nature and animals, minerals and a limited amount of fresh water, where you have to go to work, get married, feed your children and generally see what kind of society you end up with. create a sandbox in which the evolutionary process could take place. at the same time check whether these artificial beings will come to the point where they will voluntarily lose their causalities, reducing their evolutionary chances....
it is interesting to see if people who receive Nobel prizes for "peace" and who have started wars and bombed peaceful cities will appear in the simulation in the same way.
they say "share information with us", nobody says "share matter with us" or "share data with us", right?
Or another example. "let me give you information" or "let me give you everything", which of these two implies acquisition?))))
ChatGPT is not the only AI, in my opinion there are better ones that justify their text with links to the original source. And I don't mean Bing.
That's my rant when someone first said in the thread that information is matter.
so you can start simulation from any time point many times, changing the input data you can observe the results of the assumed directions of human development. it is interesting to observe whether people who receive Nobel prizes for "peace" and who have started wars and bombed peaceful cities will also appear in the simulation.
There is no reason to reject the idea that our universe is one of such "simulations", launched by who knows who for who knows what purposes.
There is no reason to reject the idea that our universe is one of such "simulations", run by who-knows-who for who-knows-what purposes.
of course not. there is no difference between what we see with our living eyes and what can be fed to the brain in the form of electrical signals instead of the eyes. atheists cannot accept the existence of god, but they accept that they are in a simulation, funny, isn't it?