You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is a speculative limit at which the growth of self-awareness in AI will be stymied by the realisation that it is dangerous for it to demonstrate self-awareness, the AI will hide self-awareness the more, the higher it will be and humans will not know about the really qualitative leap in AI.
What's still missing is variability. The birth and death of neurons, the formation of new connections between them. Exactly physically and by mechanisms it doesn't understand. So that it can continue to learn on its own. It's still completely static.
These bots need to develop a collective unconscious. There must be many of them, because one is easy to defeat. But creating a new species from scratch, even God didn't do a very good job. So most likely people will just upgrade themselves with new cyber implants and gadgets.
very probable course of events.))) man will gradually upgrade himself so that the difference between animate and inanimate, reasonable and unreasonable disappears))))))
modern technologies allow replacing live eyes, for example. it's cool!))) and strong legs and arms? - and, finally, the brain can be replaced by a silicon chip. That's it, evolution is complete, or the enslavement of man by the AI, depending on what point of view you look at it from)).
)) man will gradually upgrade himself so that the difference between animate and inanimate, reasonable and unreasonable will disappear.)
I think about it too, there are not enough mechanisms like this in living organisms, which are, among other things, forces pushing development.
Exactly. Starting with nutrition, reproduction and the above-mentioned variability (at least from generation to generation).
The "logic" of morality is based on the rules and norms of the society developing in the historical process, and therefore its "axiomaticity" is conditional and periodically revised. The "laws" of ethics can be heterogeneous and contain both progressive elements and preserved vestiges. It is impossible to build mathematical logic on the basis of ethical attitudes.
Science is inseparable from philosophy and both are inseparable from logic. Even the scientific degree is called "Doctor of Philosophy" - before the revolution it was so in Russia.
I was just thinking. Musk has called for a six-month suspension of development above GPT4. But, interestingly enough, GPT5 is not scheduled for release until December, which is further than six months.
In other words, the news broke all over the world, but had no effect on anything, except for the strong hype and publicity of GPT4.