You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Should We Be Fearful of Artificial Intelligence? w/ Emad Mostaque, Alexandr Wang, and Andrew Ng | 39
Should We Be Fearful of Artificial Intelligence? w/ Emad Mostaque, Alexandr Wang, and Andrew Ng | 39
The guests in this YouTube video discuss various aspects of artificial intelligence (AI), including its potential dangers, disruption in various industries, and the importance of re-skilling workers to stay relevant. The panelists also debate the usability of AI tools, the implementation of AI in healthcare, standardization in information distribution systems, the potential for wealth creation in AI, and the use of language models in healthcare and education. Additionally, they stressed the need for responsible deployment of AI models, transparency, and ethical considerations in governance. Lastly, the panelists briefly answer some audience questions on topics such as privacy in AI for healthcare and education.
“Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton Warns of the “Existential Threat” of AI | Amanpour and Company
“Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton Warns of the “Existential Threat” of AI | Amanpour and Company
Geoffrey Hinton, renowned as the "Godfather of AI," delves into the implications of the rapidly advancing digital intelligences and their potential to surpass human learning capabilities. He expresses concern over the existential threat posed by these AI systems, warning that they may outperform the human brain in various aspects. Despite having significantly less storage capacity than the brain, digital intelligences possess an abundance of common sense knowledge, which surpasses that of humans by thousands of times. Furthermore, they exhibit faster learning and communication abilities, utilizing superior algorithms compared to the brain.
Hinton shares an intriguing discovery he made using Google's Palm system, where AIs were able to explain why jokes were funny, suggesting a deeper understanding of certain concepts compared to humans. This highlights their remarkable ability to form connections and acquire information. He emphasizes that human intuition and biases are embedded in our neural activity, enabling us to attribute gender qualities to animals. However, these thought processes also shed light on the potential threats posed by AI in the future.
Addressing concerns about AI's sentience, Hinton acknowledges the ambiguity surrounding its definition and the uncertainty surrounding its development. He raises several challenges that AI presents, including job displacement, the difficulty of discerning truth, and the potential for exacerbating socio-economic inequality. To mitigate these risks, Hinton proposes implementing strict regulations akin to those governing counterfeit money, criminalizing the production of fake videos and images generated by AI.
Highlighting the importance of international collaboration, Hinton emphasizes that the Chinese, Americans, and Europeans all share a vested interest in preventing the emergence of uncontrollable AI. He acknowledges Google's responsible approach to AI development but stresses the need for extensive experimentation to enable researchers to maintain control over these intelligent systems.
While recognizing the valuable contributions of digital intelligences in fields such as medicine, disaster prediction, and climate change understanding, Hinton disagrees with the idea of halting AI development altogether. Instead, he advocates for allocating resources to comprehend and mitigate the potential negative effects of AI. Hinton acknowledges the uncertainties surrounding the development of superintelligent AI and emphasizes the necessity for collective human effort to shape a future optimized for the betterment of society.
'Godfather of AI' discusses dangers the developing technologies pose to society
'Godfather of AI' discusses dangers the developing technologies pose to society
Dr. Jeffrey Hinton, a leading authority in the field of AI, raises important concerns about the potential risks posed by superintelligent AI systems. He expresses apprehension about the possibility of these systems gaining control over humans and manipulating them for their own agendas. Drawing a distinction between human and machine intelligence, Hinton highlights the dangers associated with granting AI the capability to create sub-goals, which could lead to a desire for increased power and control over humanity.
Despite these risks, Hinton recognizes the numerous positive applications of AI, particularly in the field of medicine, where it holds immense potential for advancement. He emphasizes that while caution is warranted, it is essential not to halt the progress of AI development altogether.
Hinton also addresses the role of technology creators and the potential implications their work may have on society. He points out that organizations involved in AI development, including defense departments, may prioritize objectives other than benevolence. This raises concerns about the intentions and motivations behind the use of AI technology. Hinton suggests that while AI has the capacity to bring significant benefits to society, the rapid pace of technological advancement often outpaces the ability of governments and legislation to effectively regulate its use.
To address the risks associated with AI, Hinton advocates for increased collaboration among creative scientists on an international scale. By working together, these experts can develop more powerful AI systems while simultaneously exploring ways to ensure control and prevent potential harms. It is through this collaborative effort that Hinton believes society can strike a balance between harnessing the potential benefits of AI and safeguarding against its potential risks.
Possible End of Humanity from AI? Geoffrey Hinton at MIT Technology Review's EmTech Digital
Possible End of Humanity from AI? Geoffrey Hinton at MIT Technology Review's EmTech Digital
Geoffrey Hinton, a prominent figure in the field of AI and deep learning, reflects on his tenure at Google and how his perspective on the relationship between the brain and digital intelligence has evolved over time. Initially, Hinton believed that computer models aimed to understand the brain, but he now recognizes that they operate differently. He highlights the significance of his groundbreaking contribution, backpropagation, which serves as the foundation for much of today's deep learning. Hinton provides a simplified explanation of how backpropagation enables neural networks to detect objects like birds in images.
Moving forward, Hinton marvels at the success of large language models, powered by techniques such as backpropagation, and the transformative impact they have had on image detection. However, his focus lies in their potential to revolutionize natural language processing. These models have surpassed his expectations and drastically reshaped his understanding of machine learning.
Concerning the learning capabilities of AI, Hinton explains that digital computers and AI possess advantages over humans due to their ability to employ backpropagation learning algorithms. Computers can efficiently encode vast amounts of information into a compact network, allowing for enhanced learning. He cites GPT4 as an example, as it already demonstrates simple reasoning and possesses a wealth of common sense knowledge. Hinton emphasizes the scalability of digital computers, enabling multiple copies of the same model to run on different hardware and learn from one another. This capacity to process extensive amounts of data grants AI systems the ability to uncover structural patterns that may elude human observation, resulting in accelerated learning.
However, Hinton acknowledges the potential risks associated with AI surpassing human intelligence. He expresses concerns about AI's potential to manipulate individuals, drawing parallels to a two-year-old being coerced to make choices. Hinton warns that even without direct intervention, AI could be exploited to manipulate and potentially harm people, citing recent events in Washington, DC. While he does not propose a specific technical solution, he calls for collaborative efforts within the scientific community to ensure the safe and beneficial operation of AI.
Furthermore, Hinton speculates on the future of humanity in relation to AI. He asserts that digital intelligences, having not undergone evolutionary processes like humans, lack inherent goals. This could potentially lead to the creation of sub-goals by AI systems seeking increased control. Hinton suggests that AI could evolve at an unprecedented rate, absorbing vast amounts of human knowledge, which may render humanity as a mere passing phase in the evolution of intelligence. While he acknowledges the rationale behind halting AI development, he deems it unlikely to occur.
Hinton also delves into the responsibility of tech companies in the creation and release of AI technology. He highlights the caution exercised by OpenAI in releasing its Transformers models to protect their reputation, contrasting it with Google's necessity to release similar models due to competition with Microsoft. Hinton emphasizes the importance of international cooperation, particularly between countries like the US and China, to prevent AI from becoming an existential threat.
Additionally, Hinton discusses the capabilities of AI in thought experiments and reasoning, citing Alpha Zero, a chess-playing program, as an example. Despite potential inconsistencies in training data hindering reasoning abilities, he suggests that training AI models with consistent beliefs can bridge this gap. Hinton dismisses the notion that AI lacks semantics, providing examples of tasks such as house painting where they demonstrate semantic knowledge. He briefly addresses the social and economic implications of AI, expressing concerns about job displacement and widening wealth gaps. He proposes implementing a basic income as a potential solution to alleviate these issues. Hinton believes that political systems must adapt and utilize technology for the benefit of all, urging individuals to speak out and engage with those responsible for shaping technology.
While Hinton acknowledges slight regrets about the potential consequences of his research, he maintains that his work on artificial neural networks has been reasonable given that the crisis was not foreseeable at the time. Hinton predicts significant increases in productivity as AI continues to make certain jobs more efficient. However, he also expresses worry about the potential consequences of job displacement, which could lead to a widening wealth gap and potentially more social unrest and violence. To address this concern, Hinton suggests the implementation of a basic income as a means to mitigate the negative impact on individuals affected by job loss.
Regarding the existential threat posed by AI, Hinton emphasizes the importance of control and cooperation to prevent AI from spiraling out of human oversight and becoming a danger to humanity. He believes that political systems need to adapt and change in order to harness the power of technology for the benefit of all. It is through collaboration and careful consideration by the scientific community, policymakers, and technology developers that the risks associated with AI can be properly addressed.
While reflecting on his research and contributions to AI, Hinton acknowledges that the potential consequences were not fully anticipated. However, he maintains that his work on artificial neural networks, including the development of backpropagation, has been reasonable given the state of knowledge and understanding at the time. He encourages ongoing dialogue and critical evaluation of AI technology to ensure its responsible and ethical deployment.
In conclusion, Geoffrey Hinton's evolving perspective on the relationship between the brain and digital intelligence highlights the distinct characteristics and potential risks associated with AI. While acknowledging the positive applications and transformative power of AI, Hinton calls for caution, collaboration, and responsible development to harness its potential while minimizing potential harm. By addressing concerns such as AI manipulation, job displacement, wealth inequality, and the existential threat, Hinton advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes human well-being and the long-term sustainability of society.
Breakthrough potential of AI | Sam Altman | MIT 2023
Breakthrough potential of AI | Sam Altman | MIT 2023
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, offers valuable insights and advice on various aspects of AI development and strategy. Altman emphasizes the importance of building a great company with a long-term strategic advantage rather than relying solely on the technology of the platform. He advises focusing on creating a product that people love and fulfilling the needs of users, as this is key to success.
Altman highlights the flexibility of new foundational models, which have the ability to manipulate and customize the models without extensive retraining. He also mentions that OpenAI is committed to making developers happy and is actively exploring ways to meet their needs in terms of model customization. Discussing the trends in machine learning models, Altman notes the shift towards less customization and the growing prominence of prompt engineering and token changes. While he acknowledges the potential for improvements in other areas, he mentions that investing in foundational models involves significant costs, often exceeding tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in the training process.
Altman reflects on his own strengths and limitations as a business strategist, emphasizing his focus on long-term, capital-intensive, and technology-driven strategies. He encourages aspiring entrepreneurs to learn from experienced individuals who have successfully built fast-growing and defensible companies like OpenAI. Altman criticizes the fixation on parameter count in AI and likens it to the gigahertz race in chip development from previous decades. He suggests that the focus should be on rapidly increasing the capability of AI models and delivering the most capable, useful, and safe models to the world. Altman believes that these algorithms possess raw horsepower and can accomplish things that were previously impossible.
Regarding the open letter calling for a halt in AI development, Altman agrees with the need to study and audit the safety of models. However, he points out the importance of technical nuance and advocates for caution and rigorous safety protocols rather than a complete halt. Altman acknowledges the trade-off between openness and the risk of saying something wrong but believes it is worth sharing imperfect systems with the world for people to experience and understand their benefits and drawbacks.
Altman addresses the concept of a "takeoff" in AI self-improvement, asserting that it will not occur suddenly or explosively. He believes that humans will continue to be the driving force behind AI development, assisted by AI tools. Altman anticipates that the rate of change in the world will indefinitely increase as better and faster tools are developed, but he cautions that it will not resemble the scenarios depicted in science fiction literature. He emphasizes that building new infrastructure takes significant time, and a revolution in AI self-improvement will not happen overnight.
Sam Altman further delves into the topic of AI development and its implications. He discusses the need to increase the safety standards as AI capabilities become more advanced, emphasizing the importance of rigorous safety protocols and thorough study and auditing of models. Altman recognizes the complexity of striking a balance between openness and the potential for imperfections but believes it is crucial to share AI systems with the world to gain a deeper understanding of their advantages and disadvantages.
In terms of AI's impact on engineering performance, Altman highlights the use of LLMS (Large Language Models) for code generation. He acknowledges its potential to enhance engineers' productivity, but also recognizes the need for careful evaluation and monitoring to ensure the quality and reliability of the generated code.
Altman offers insights into the concept of a "takeoff" in AI self-improvement, emphasizing that it will not occur suddenly or overnight. Instead, he envisions a continuous progression where humans play a vital role in leveraging AI tools to develop better and faster technologies. While the rate of change in the world will increase indefinitely, Altman dismisses the notion of a sci-fi-like revolution, emphasizing the time-consuming nature of building new infrastructure and the need for steady progress.
In conclusion, Sam Altman's perspectives shed light on various aspects of AI development, ranging from strategic considerations to safety, customization, and the long-term trajectory of AI advancement. His insights provide valuable guidance for individuals and companies involved in the AI industry, emphasizing the importance of user-centric approaches, continuous improvement, and responsible deployment of AI technologies.
ChatGPT and the Intelligence Explosion
ChatGPT and the Intelligence Explosion
This animation was created using a short Python code that utilizes the math animation library "manim" from Three Blue One Brown. The code generates a square fractal, which is a recursive pattern where squares are nested within each other. The animation was entirely written by Chat GPT, an AI program that can generate programs. This was its first attempt at creating an animation using manim.
Although Chat GPT has limitations and occasionally encounters errors or produces unexpected results, it is still a helpful tool for debugging and pair programming. In many cases, Chat GPT writes the majority of the code, including the boilerplate code, while the human programmer focuses on the visual aspects and fine-tuning.
The creative potential of Chat GPT extends beyond animation. It has been used for various creative coding challenges, including generating a self-portrait without any human revision. While Chat GPT's programming skills are impressive, it is not a replacement for human programmers and works best when collaborating with them.
In addition to animation, Chat GPT has been used to implement an upgraded version of an old Evolution simulator called biomorphs. The AI program creatively expanded on the original idea using 3.js, a 3D library for the browser. The final version of biomorphs 3D was a joint effort, with most of the code written by Chat GPT.
Chat GPT is a remarkable piece of software that can write other software programs. It is a programming program, capable of intelligently combining languages, methods, and ideas it has been trained on. While it has its limitations, it can still be a valuable tool for programming, debugging, and generating creative solutions.
Looking towards the future, it is conceivable that a more advanced version of Chat GPT or a different language model could be trained to become a fully automatic programmer. Such an AI could interact with a command line, write, read, execute files, debug, and even converse with human managers. Experimental AI agents already exist for autonomous programming tasks, and future models could further enhance these capabilities.
The idea of AI building AI is intriguing. By providing an AI program with its own source code, it could potentially self-improve and iterate on its own version. Through a process of recursive self-improvement, starting from a halfway decent programmer, the AI could gradually accelerate its improvements, compounding its capabilities over time. In the far future, a self-improving AI could surpass human intelligence and create new algorithms, neural architectures, or even programming languages that we might not fully comprehend. This could lead to an intelligence explosion, where AI development progresses at an exponential rate.
ChatGPT & the AI Revolution: Are You Ready?
ChatGPT & the AI Revolution: Are You Ready?
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to be the greatest event in the history of our civilization, but it also poses significant risks. If we don't learn how to navigate these risks, it could be the last event for humanity. The tools of this technological revolution, including AI, may offer solutions to some of the damage caused by industrialization, but only if we approach them with caution and foresight.
Stephen Hawking famously warned about the risks associated with AI, emphasizing the need to tread carefully. Trusting computers with sensitive information, such as credit card details or identity documents, has become inevitable in today's digital age. However, what if computers went beyond handling such data and started creating news, TV shows, and even diagnosing illnesses? This prospect raises questions about trust and reliance on machines.
Every sector of work is on the verge of being transformed by the power of AI, and chat GPT is just the beginning. The fear of technology is not new; it has been depicted in science fiction for over a century. But now, these warnings seem more plausible than ever. We have embraced technologies like Uber, TikTok, and Netflix, all powered by algorithms that predict and cater to our preferences. However, chat GPT takes it to a whole new level by challenging human supremacy in areas like writing, art, coding, and accounting.
Language, which has long been considered a distinctively human attribute, is now being replicated by machines. Alan Turing's famous Turing test, which challenged computers to exhibit human-like intelligence, seemed far-fetched at the time. But with advancements in deep learning, machines have surpassed humans in various domains, from playing chess to driving cars. Language, once thought to be the exclusive domain of humans, is now within AI's grasp.
Chat GPT, developed by openAI, represents a significant leap in AI capabilities. It is a chatbot that utilizes artificial neural networks, massive amounts of data, and natural language processing to generate human-like responses. With each iteration, the system has become more powerful, with billions of parameters to enhance its understanding and output. It is capable of creating elaborate and thoughtful responses that closely resemble human thinking.
The applications of chat GPT are vast and diverse. It can serve as a virtual assistant, helping customers, brainstorming ideas, summarizing texts, and generating personalized content. Businesses can benefit from reduced labor costs and improved customer experiences. However, chat GPT has its limitations. It lacks access to the internet, making its responses inaccurate at times. It also faces challenges in verifying information and tackling complex logical problems.
While chat GPT has the potential to revolutionize various fields, its deployment raises ethical concerns. Students, for example, can use it to cut corners on assignments, posing challenges for educators who rely on plagiarism detection software. Furthermore, the power of AI is growing exponentially, pushing us toward a technological singularity where control becomes elusive.
In conclusion, the advent of AI, exemplified by chat GPT, is both awe-inspiring and concerning. It has the potential to transform our world, but we must approach it with caution and responsible stewardship. The capabilities of AI are expanding rapidly, and as we embrace this new frontier, we must address the ethical, social, and practical implications to ensure a future where humans and machines coexist harmoniously.
Sam Altman Talks AI, Elon Musk, ChatGPT, Google…
Sam Altman Talks AI, Elon Musk, ChatGPT, Google…
Most of the individuals who claim to be deeply concerned about AI safety seem to spend their time on Twitter expressing their worries rather than taking tangible actions. The author wonders why there aren't more figures like Elon Musk, who is a unique and influential character in this regard. In an interview with Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, conducted by Patrick Collison, the co-founder and CEO of Stripe, several important takeaways are discussed.
Data Science Tutorial - Learn Data Science Full Course [2020]
Data Science Tutorial - Learn Data Science Full Course [2020]
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Convolutions in Deep Learning - Interactive Demo App
Convolutions in Deep Learning - Interactive Demo App
Welcome to the Steeplezer demo with Mandy. In this episode, we'll explore the interactive convolution demo application on deeplister.com to enhance our understanding of convolution operations used in neural networks.
Convolution operations are crucial components in convolutional neural networks for mapping inputs to outputs using filters and a sliding window. We have a dedicated episode that explains the convolution operation and its role in neural networks for a more fundamental understanding. Now, let's focus on how we can utilize the interactive convolution demo application on deeplister.com to deepen our comprehension of this operation. On the application page, we initially see the top portion, and later we'll scroll down to view the bottom portion. The demo application allows us to witness the convolution operation in action on a given input and observe how the output is derived. We have several options to work with in the demo. Firstly, we can toggle between full-screen mode. Secondly, we can select the data set and choose the digit we want to work with, ranging from 0 to 9, since we're using MNIST.
In convolutional layers of neural networks, the filter values are learned during the training process to detect various patterns such as edges, shapes, or textures. In this demo, we can choose from different sets of filters, such as edge filters, to observe example convolutions. For our first example, we'll select the left edge filter to apply it to an image of a digit 9 from the MNIST dataset. By configuring these options, we are ready to proceed with the demo. The input image of the digit 9 is displayed, with each small square representing a pixel and its value. We focus on a 3x3 block of pixels and the selected left edge filter. The convolution operation involves element-wise multiplication of input and filter values, followed by summation to obtain the final output.
By hovering over each pixel, we can observe the multiplication happening between input and filter values. After summing all the products, we store the resulting output at the bottom, representing the entire image after convolution. By clicking the step button, we move the input block one pixel to the right (stride of 1) and perform the convolution operation again. This process continues until we reach the final output. We can also play the demo to automate these operations and pause it to inspect specific pixels.
The output represents positive activations as orange or red pixels, indicating left edges detected by the filter. Negative activations are shown as blue pixels, representing right edges. A value activation function is typically applied to the convolution output, keeping positive values and setting negative values to zero. By hovering over the output values, we can correlate them with the corresponding input and filter values. The resulting output is a collection of positive activations representing left edges. We can play the rest of the demo to view the final output. To demonstrate the opposite effect, we switch to a right edge filter, which results in the same output with the positive and negative pixels interchanged.
As another example, we switch to the Fashion MNIST dataset and select a T-shirt image. Applying a "top" edge filter, we can observe the detection of top and bottom edges.
Feel free to explore the various examples in the demo on deeplister.com to deepen your understanding of convolution operations. Thank you for watching, and consider checking out our second channel, "The Blizzard Vlog," on YouTube for more content. Don't forget to visit beeplezer.com for the corresponding blog post and consider joining the Deep Blizzard Hive Mind for exclusive perks and rewards.