Experiment - page 271

New comment
 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov #:

By "rattle" I meant the case ofhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/367874/page269#comment_24934954

That's what I'm talking about.
 
khorosh #:

Yusuf, no one is interested in anyone else's success here. I'm sure that if equity continues to grow, the branch will be dead. But if things get bad and the equity starts to drop catastrophically, everyone will come running to sneer again. Just like crows fly in on the smell of fall.) It's the same in Oleg's branch of the automaton.

You yourself have shown that Yusuf's trade is no different from the mashka trade. All more or less reasonable people on the forum have been trying to show him the same thing for ten years - that all his genius invention is an ordinary moving average, though in a perverted and veiled form.
 
sibirqk #:
You yourself have shown that Yusuf's trading is no different from the MAs. This is what all more or less intelligent people on the forum have been trying to show him for a decade - that his genius invention is an ordinary moving average, but in a distorted and veiled form.

Do you have any reason to say so? Just - that, in particular, a sell position in gold closed (at 00:00) and a buy position opened. How do you explain this circumstance from the position of MAs? What is the"perversely veiled form"?

 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov #:

Do you have any reason to say so? Just - that, in particular, a sell position in gold closed (at 00:00) and a buy position opened. How do you explain this circumstance from the position of MAs? What is the"perversely veiled form"?

Yusuf, stop clowning around.
Anyone who is not a simpleton understands this obviousness.
 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov #:

What is the"twisted and veiled form"?

Normally, a simple moving average is calculated by summing the data over a period and dividing the resulting sum by the period in the sliding window. You use spells and magic formulas to do this. Of course the law does not prohibit this, but the traditional ways are more traditional.
 
sibirqk #:
You have shown yourself that Yusuf's trading is no different from trading on the mashka. This is what all the more or less intelligent people on the forum have been trying to tell him for a decade - that his genius invention is a regular moving average, but in a twisted and veiled form.

So? Everyone thinks their child is the best, the most beautiful. Let it not be so, just don't cross the line into direct insults, as some people do. Everyone has the right to experiment and test their ideas and assumptions. Time will put everything in its place. As Yusuf rightly said, chickens are counted in the autumn. In addition, he wrote that if he fails, he will courageously admit defeat. No matter what anyone says, Yusuf is a creative contributor to this forum, an author of interesting ideas. There are not many of them here. Without such characters, the forum would not be interesting.

 
khorosh #:

So? Everyone thinks their child is the best, the most beautiful. Let it not be so, just don't cross the line into direct insults, as some people do. Everyone has the right to experiment and test their ideas and assumptions. Time will put everything in its place. As Yusuf rightly said, chickens are counted in the autumn. In addition, he wrote that if he fails, he will courageously admit defeat. No matter what anyone says, Yusuf is a creative contributor to this forum, an author of interesting ideas. There are not many of them here. Without such characters, the forum would not be interesting.

I don't mind the experiments or Yusuf. He likes his pension, as they say, so be it. In my opinion, of course, it would make more sense to spend it on his grandchildren, but that's all individual.
 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov #:

You won't see this on TF D1.


What difference does it make which TF? Let's say on TF D1 five days = five sample points, and on M1 it will be 7200 points. 7200 points is better, right? There is more information, and probably less chatter due to more input data.


We need to solve the chatter problem somehow. Maybe by pre-smoothing the price, other options... Suggest any thoughts.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov #:


... Suggest your thoughts.

We can make the decision to enter the market be taken if the indicator gives a corresponding signal in one direction on several last bars in a row. Of course, this will lead to additional delay.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov #:


What difference does it make which TF? Let's say on TF D1 five days = five sample points, and on M1 it would be 7200 points. 7200 points is better, right? There is more information, probably less chatter due to more input data.


We need to solve the chatter problem somehow. Maybe with a price reduction, other options... Suggest your thoughts.

There is another possibility to solve this problem:

As you know, the PNBs give you three possibilities for inputs - 1, 2, 3. Entries 1 and 2 are identical and allow you to enter when the indicator lines are split and the trend is unstable. And, the 3rd entry option is interesting: you may enter the market only when the trend is stable, when all three indicator lines are united. However, the total time of staying in the market will decrease. This variant should be compared with the previous variant in the tester by main parameters, for example, by profitability and stability.

1...264265266267268269270271272273274275276277
New comment