From theory to practice. Part 2 - page 34
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good adventures
wouldn't say.
from world to world ;)
No, I had to cut almost all of that off in principle. Because it doesn't work, it's about 99.9% and probably almost 100% except for Theorver, it only has RMS, R|S - dependence and that's it, nothing else is universal. Well, and fractal geometry a little bit of gore-halfway somewhere can somehow be applied universally.
And the most interesting thing is that I understood and calculated in fact, that the probability of an event does not depend on the observed process, but directly on the observer.
Interestingly, no theorist book seems to say this, at least I have not found it. And this is an extremely important point, which changes the whole point of finding probabilities in general.
And the most interesting thing is that I understood and calculated in fact, that the probability of an event does not depend on the observed process, but directly on the observer.
Interestingly, it is not written in any theorist book, at least I have not found it. And this is an extremely important point that changes the whole essence of finding probabilities.
of course
the guy's pouring with his own hands
;)
but the fact that we have speed (in green) and not the path (in red) in front of our eyes - do you have an insight into this?
if so, take a screenshot and draw the future ;)
move red to the right
//---
© new-rena
the probability of an event does not depend on the observed process, but directly on the observer.
1000%
And the most interesting thing is that I understood and calculated in fact, that the probability of an event does not depend on the observed process, but directly on the observer.
It is interesting that none of the books on theorists seems to say this, at least I have not found it. And this is an extremely important point that changes the whole essence of finding probabilities.
There is such a notion - subjective probability. Within the theoretician it is perceived as one of the possible ways of setting probability and is not highlighted. Within matstat (especially its modern form - theory of decision making) it serves as a philosophical justification for the Bayesian approach.
well, of course.
the guy's pouring with his own hands.
;)
Have you seen the speed (in green) and not the path (in red) in front of our eyes?
if so, take a screenshot and draw the future ;)
move red to the right
//---
© new-rena
Another secret encrypted message, well, there's certainly something to it :)
Hello
Secret encrypted messages again, well there's certainly something to it :)
Hello, .
no trigonometry there
XAUUSD
well, of course.
the guy's pouring with his own hands.
;)
Have you seen speed (in green) and not track (in red) in front of our eyes?
if so, take a screenshot and draw the future ;)
move red to the right
//---
© new-rena
Is there a GIF with visualization?)
Is there a GIF with a visualisation?)
no gif.
monday will show it in person.
two forecasts for the whole week