I am looking for a MATHEMATIC PROGRAMMER with knowledge of probability theory and MQL4-MQL5, to work together on a project. - page 14
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Nah. The author is wasting his time anyway. That's just the whole zimmes of the situation is that in the presence of l...a like-minded, this time is sharply reduced to a value depending on the hard skills l...a (well, I do not believe in the grail, too much of them I have already seen).
So, draw conclusions.
PS. Well you will not find a normal specialist to work for a grail, which is somewhere out there. A normal specialist wants to eat here and now, and to have a rest not less than 2 times a year, in hotels, not 5* a la Egypt, but slightly higher (Hilton, Rixos, Selectum or Mitsis, for example, look at the prices).
PSS. Want to make a grail? Three options: teach it yourself, pay it yourself and look for an investor. Ah, well, yes, there is still hope for someone for a chuppa-chupps. Anybody else have any advice?
PSSS. Didn't mean to offend anyone. Just for thought.
First, if you are not interested - the cooperation does not seem immediately profitable, respectively, people who are interested - ***. Please leave your conclusions inside and refrain - you are an adult, unlike some?
Second, obsession with the grail does not allow many people here to understand that it is not a grail ...
GRAIL GRAIL GRAIL :-O
There's just one child looking for "like-minded people" without stating his thoughts :-)
The first message in the thread is clearly written for those who are in principle interested in the subject, and it says -"Who is interested please write in person ".
Everything is discussed with adults there, who can read and understand the meaning, then they can refuse, can continue to work with me, but those who are interested - have already decided in principle through correspondence here.
It works as it should be - it separates those who need it from those who are interested in ambitions or need $100 and so on ... Understand - if other people's views differ from yours, it doesn't mean they're bad - they're just different!
Or maybe you're wrong, because you're not God, by all accounts, but only a small part of him, who hasn't even identified with him yet)
I'll be sure to write. Maybe someone will understand what direction to go in, maybe they will say it's not my thing, I will continue to study using indicators or something else...
Roman, there is a question. What is the meaning of the concept of "non-dynamic" trading? You do not use standard indicators? Or you do not look at the price history?
I am saying that if you somehow transform the price on the history to detect a pattern in the current price, it is an indicator. Your own, non-standard, but an indicator, the way even without visualisation.
After reading your Chaos Theory and realizing that prediction is not your thing, it begs the question; why don't you go for options, the risks are the same 50/50 but the profits are bigger)
Also, if you are so confident in the profitability of your TS, why not go to freelancing?
Although, you are not interested in opinions, you just need a free programmer, bored)
Send me your phone number and I'll explain it to you in person!
There are private messages.
Roman, there is a question. What is the meaning you give to the concept of non-syndicated trading? You do not use standard indicators? Or do you not look at the price history at all?
I am saying that if you somehow transform the price on the history to identify a pattern in the current price, then it is an indicator. Your own, non-standard, but an indicator, the way even without visualisation.
When I see the combination "indicatorless trading" - I am absolutely sure that this person does not think about what an indicator shows and what an "indicator" is. Moreover, I am very curious how one can trade without using a candlestick or at least a line indicator for quotes.
George, that's right!
I think there is a problem of understanding terms here and everywhere else in communication. Everyone puts their own meaning into the concept, and when people start talking, the same words paint slightly different pictures in their heads.
And then we argue and argue. And when the waves of righteous indignation subside, it all turns out to be empty. There was nothing to argue about, nothing to talk about, just an unpleasant residue.
boring)
In general, in principle, the forum is boring. There is no joint exploratory work, we talk about nothing: about ourselves, about our superiority, about our vast knowledge. Endless arguments about terms: trend, flat, point, yin, yang, bullshit and so on.
Sometimes it is interesting to gossip, but it is not very useful. We rarely have interesting thoughts and ideas. But this is very rare.
The question is not even about ideas, but about the interest of working together in public. What for? For nothing. It's fun.
To work on a project requires:
- a client to set a goal and have money for all the others
- a project manager, not to lose rhythm in pursuit of the goal and not to waste money
- a planner, to translate and coordinate the customer's wants into achievable steps and milestones
- a subject analyst, to analyze the domain and translate formulas into a language understandable to a developer
- Developer, to implement everything into the code
- tester, to check the code for performance and consistency with the goals, points and milestones
these are all different roles, people and faces...and maybe not all
But without clauses "clear objective" and "money" the roles do not fit together and no team is formed.
Free - even if one role on enthusiasm, for the feeling of the collective and the coming plushies doesn't work, the project fails and all others are fucked
To work on a project requires:
- a client to set a goal and have money for all the others
- a project manager, not to lose rhythm in pursuit of the goal and not to waste money
- a planner, to translate and coordinate the customer's wants into achievable steps and milestones
- a subject analyst, to analyze the domain and translate formulas into a language understandable to a developer
- Developer, to implement everything into the code
- tester, to check the code for performance and consistency with the goals, points and milestones
these are all different roles, people and faces...and maybe not all
But without clauses "clear objective" and "money" the roles do not fit together and no team is formed.
Free - even if one role on enthusiasm, for the feeling of the collective and the coming plushies doesn't work, the project fails and all the others are fucked.
No, well, some things can be moved on enthusiasm, too. For example, if you have an idea of some complicated indicator that a participant cannot program. They will put forth their ideas and show that this idea has a certain trader's perspective. If the idea is good, it will be developed and formalized into a rigorous algorithm, and then we will find a person who will code it into a ready-to-use indicator.
But, alas, most people are not interested in such work - this is just an indicator, not even a ready graphical strategy ... What's the point of bothering? Add to this the fact that the author of the idea, as a rule, considers it supergraphic, and does not want to reveal all the details - which further dissuades people ... Well, in the end, it all goes down the drain.
All want to catch the heat with other people's hands ... No one wants to invest (even just time and effort).