You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Analysis has shown that during slowdowns the load spikes up to 100% with strong market activity and trade orders. As a result, the response from the trading server to the terminal takes a VERY long time.
The only thing that comes to mind is to separate EAs into different terminals.
The MT5 is a nimble platform. But there are bottlenecks that negate all efforts at fast trading.
I would like to collect the problems here, discuss and solve them somewhere with my own efforts, somewhere with the help of the Developers.
A short description of the first output of MT5 who can tell me?
Here's a good one... https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/133408
The only thing I can think of is to spread the EAs across different terminals.
Doesn't help, there is only one server.
I have 6 servers in Otkryvashka and it still lags, especially when modifying pending orders.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/38456/page139#comment_16242891
It doesn't work, there's only one server.
The server's not involved. Everything is perfect in its logs. The delay is on the terminal side.
The server has nothing to do with it. Everything is perfect in its logs. The delay is on the terminal side.
So it's not the server, it's the terminal (asynchronous order)
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/38456/page139#comment_16242891
The only thing that comes to mind is to spread the EAs across different terminals.
Turns out this has all been described in some detail once upon a time.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
MT5 and Speed in Action
fxsaber, 2021.02.18 08:05
With absolutely zero pings.
MT5 server was processing each order in hundredths of ms. That's just putting out pending orders and nothing else.
Forgot I had stepped on this rake.
The only thing that comes to mind is to spread the advisers across different terminals.
... and invest another 10 grand to spread different terminals on different hardware)
... and invest another 10 grand to spread the different terminals across different glands)
No, you don't have to do that. 20-30 terminals will work fine on a powerful hardware.