Some signs of the right TCs - page 2

 
fxsaber:

Market patterns do not change in the cases of

  • Multiplying symbol prices by a non-zero constant.
  • Symbol flip (1/Symbol
)

As a conclusion, the correct TS should give identical trading signals when run on any custom symbol derived from the original action described above.


For example, we took the EURUSD. We ran the TS, getting a series of entries.

Then we created the symbol 100/EURUSD. Then we ran the TS. Entries should coincide with the original ones.


If this does not happen (99%), the TS is not written correctly.


How TS should react to symbols taken to some degree - I haven't worked it out.

did you find confirmation of your assumption (what is highlighted in the quote) ?

If the original premise is not confirmed in practice, then all the following conclusions are thumbs up

 
fxsaber:

Market patterns do not change in the cases of

  • Multiplication of symbol prices by a non-zero constant.
  • Symbol flip (1/Symbol).

As a conclusion, proper TS should give identical trade signals when run on any custom symbol derived from the original action described above.

For example, we took the EURUSD. We ran the TS, getting a series of entries.

Then created the 100/EURUSD symbol. Then we ran the TS. Entries should coincide with the original ones.


If this does not happen (99%), the TS is not written correctly.


How TS should react to the symbols, raised to some degree - I do not understand.

What makes you think the TS would be wrong, can you give me an example in the studio on a real strategy?
 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

have you found confirmation of your hypothesis (what is highlighted in the quote) ?

It's not a hypothesis, it's a true statement.

If the original premise is not confirmed by practice, then all conclusions that follow from it are thumbs up.

No practice is out of the question here.

 
fxsaber:

This is not a hypothesis, but a true statement.

There's no question of any practice here.

what makes you think it is true ?

If you look at it as a wish, then YES, a normal wish...in all near-grale topics, they are looking for profits

 
fxsaber:

This is not a hypothesis, but a true statement.

No practice is out of the question here.

What is the point of making this true statement? If you haven't tested it in practice?
 
DARYIA SHAPOLOVA:
And what makes you think that the TS will not be correct, can you give me an example in the studio on a real strategy?

Where is your example? - did not find the search

ZS: EA under MT4 with tester grail immediately found , monitoring show

 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

What makes you think it is true?

Imagine you don't have a EURUSD symbol, but you have USDEUR. What does the market pattern between the two currencies (EUR and USD) have to do with, a classical or inverse ratio of the value of those currencies being translated into your terminal?

 
fxsaber:

Imagine you don't have a EURUSD symbol, but you have USDEUR. What does the market pattern between the two currencies (EUR and USD) have to do with whether the classic or inverse of the value of those currencies translates to your terminal?

They (EUR and USD) have different volumes in the market and there is a significant difference in how the lots are measured and in what budgets speculators maintain, in what margins, how swaps are calculated. Business cycles are different and exchanges open at different times.

A working EA for EURUSD is just about obliged to falsify on USDEUR.

 
fxsaber:

Imagine you don't have a EURUSD symbol, but you have USDEUR. What does the market pattern between the two currencies (EUR and USD) have to do with the classic or inverse ratio of the value of these currencies translated into your terminal?

Definitely forward and reverse quote it should trade the same, multiplication by coefficients, adding coefficients, it's all the same, what difference does the price make 2, or 20, there should not be a difference definitely. As for the exponentiation, it depends on the robot. We get non-linear data and the robot perceives it differently. Although it is possible to deal with non-linear distortions.

 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

EUR and USD have different volumes in the market and there is a significant difference in how the lots are measured and in what budgets speculators keep, what is the margin and how swaps are calculated. Business cycles are different and exchanges open at different times.

a working EA for EURUSD is practically obliged to falsify on USDEUR.

Why should it fail on a reverse quote? I don't see why.