Crowdsourced GUI. Open beta testing. - page 46
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I've said it loud and clear - you don't need to compile the plug-in files individually. They are interconnected WITHIN THE COUNTER. Without it, - neither the engine, nor the kernel, nor the api file will compile and there is no mistake about it. This is the structure of the solution. Who wants - let him write his own.
No need to look for bugs where there are none. There are enough bugs as it is.
Please)). For example, Anatoly Kozharsky's library, - written in classical PLO, was created for a year and a half. At the same time - it borrowed many solutions from SB. Of course, Anatoly made a lot of his own, but a year and a half... I was working on my graphics for 4 years. But, I started from scratch and went my own way. So, allot yourself a couple of years to spare and get started.
Not..... )))) what a couple of years....)))) that's not the way to go
Sasha, we already went through this a month ago, and also a year ago and two years ago.
Pyotr is creating his own standards, which is why he has been developing them for several years.
You are not the first to try to help Pyotr and channel his energy in a more correct direction.
Peter's project is a thing in itself and nothing more. Until Peter brings the code to generally accepted standards - the project will only satisfy his own ego and no one needs it.
If he reacts rather painfully to the simplest things and claims that warnings and errors are the norm, what more can we talk about?
It's not the end product that matters to Peter! No one will see the "product" for a couple of years at least.
It's the process that counts! It's the process that makes Pyotr feel good about himself. That's the whole story!
He convinces himself: "I'm such a cool guy, I don't know anything about programming, but I'm creating my own programming standards, and I'm developing something that no one has done before me!"
In fact, what he's writing is very much like something that was a long time ago at ...... in its early stages. So don't assume that no one has ever done this before
Sasha, we already went through this a month ago, and also a year ago and two years ago.
Pyotr is creating his own standards, which is why he has been developing them for several years.
You are not the first to try to help Pyotr and channel his energy in a more correct direction.
Peter's project is a thing in itself and nothing more. Until Peter brings the code to generally accepted standards - the project will only satisfy his own ego and no one needs it.
If he reacts rather painfully to the simplest things and claims that warnings and errors are the norm, what more can we talk about?
It's not the end product that matters to Peter! No one will see the "product" for a couple of years at least.
It's the process that counts! It's the process itself that's pleasing to Pyotr's ego. That's the whole story!
He convinces himself: "I'm such a cool guy, I don't know anything about programming, but I'm creating my own programming standards, and I'm developing something that no one has done before me!"
so what about doing the basics?
In fact, what he writes is very similar to what happened a long time ago at ...... in its early stages. So don't assume that no one has ever done that before.
Sasha, of course all of us have! But none of us boasted about it, did not boast that it was the norm and the standard!
As soon as our elders or more experienced comrades pointed out to us the unacceptability of this or that behavior or piece of code, then what did we do? We listened and reworked it properly!
You could go as far as to say: "The traffic rules were invented by idiots, we don't have to follow them! Any road was originally a dirt road, so nobody will forbid us to drive on lawns and pave the way! Don't hold yourselves back by the boundaries of convention! Everything starts with atoms! ...."
The stupid thing is that you don't have the brains to listen to what you're being told.
We're done with you.
Everyone else who doesn't care about custom solutions and needs results - I invite you to continue testing. You will be able to create in minutes what used to take days and weeks.
The next step is multi-window mode, adding and removing items.
The update will be at the end of the coming week. Everything will be there.
I'm all for it, I'm ready to get involved. This is a very interesting project, not only in terms of its applicability, but also in terms of its own development.
Then let's get started!!! I suggest we start with the coordinates.
Peter - for now the plan is still the same - quick implementation then updates. To make files compile, you can just temporarily deadlock missing functions (arrays) by defining. It would be more convenient for us. We would not have to switch between files to run the compiler to show us the errors.
Let's get started then!!! I suggest we start with the coordinates
...
Good luck! I will keep track of your progress.