Let's build a mini grail!? - page 34
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't try very hard to show any nonsense here.
Here is an article from the developers of MQ that explains how you can get the "Grail":https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/239
It shows how to do it.
You are not being practical. It's just a programmers toy, it's obvious and useless!
Programmers don't make money in the market...You are not practical. It's just a programmers' toy, it's obvious and useless!
Programmers do not make money in the market...Why don't they make money because you are not a programmer ?
Don't try too hard to show some nonsense here.
Here is an article from the developers of MQ that explains how to get the "Grail":https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/239
It shows how to do it.
Also read:
In 2011 there was no "All ticks based on real ticks" mode yet
There are 100++1 ways in the tester other than this to show the crooked grail. ))
But since you're showing it, it's not a grail for some reason))
It's a candidate for further testing - checking it on demo, putting it on real.
No, it's not a grail!
The grail works with the same settings on ANY pair!
I highly doubt this. Different pairs are different samples from the population, so their estimation parameters are different. It's like finding the parameters of a Regression line on one sample and then fitting them to another, the error will be immediately visible.
No, it's not a grail!
So making a test report on this pair on a six-month site is very easy:The dependence of the stability of the estimation on the sample size is a task I'm still going to do, but haven't got around to it yet. I have a feeling that 3-4 months will be enough for some, and for some a whole year is needed. We'll see what to guess.
But since you are showing it, it means that for some reason it is not a grail.)
So why did you open this thread even if you admit that no one will show you the grail? Is it for nothing?
How many Grail branches are there (:o)
No, it's not a grail!
...
The grail works with the same settings on ANY pair!
Any abstraction expressed in words can be studied down to a "non-abstraction" i.e. an ordinary entity (perhaps unattainable, marginal, but understandable)
it is possible to assume the weak sign - if we decompose a"grail" trading series into limits, then removal of any two adjacent ones does not cause drawdown and does not change its "grail".
If the premise is correct, then the unexpected conclusion is: grail-like algorithms trade on an expanding zigzag.