Points VS Pips - page 55
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So in monetary terms the fifth point is somehow very different from the fourth. It's called the same thing.
How about in parrots or boa constrictors?
How about in parrots or boa constrictors?
The question is not unreasonable, how do you explain this point?
So is a tonne of fluff from a tonne of iron in volume very different. Just don't confuse the dick with the carrot.
So is a tonne of fluff from a tonne of iron in volume very different. Just don't confuse the dick with the carrot.
So when there's no answer, you're just talking rubbish, OK, I get it.
How do I know if you've had half your brain amputated and half your skull titaned shut. Show me a certificate that you are mentally fit.
And what is it you don't understand, the difference between fluff and iron, what a ton is, or haven't you seen a carrot and dick?
How do I know if you have half your brain amputated and half your skull set in titanium? Show me a certificate that you are mentally fit.
And what don't you understand there, what's the difference between fluff and iron, what's a ton, or haven't you seen a carrot and dick?
How about in parrots or in booms?
it's already been suggested here: farts, pipisets, cheburahs...
in ten years' time, the next translator will write "farts" or "cheburashki" in MT :)
if meta-quota point = meta-quota pips, why did MQ introduce the term, why don't they want to continue to use their point?
they already suggested it: farts, pipsets, pips...
in ten years' time, the next translator will write "farts" or "cheburashki" in MT :)
if methaquot point = methaquot pips, why did MQ introduce the term, why don't they want to continue to use their point?
The point is not a meta-quota point, it is a real point. And I don't care about the pip at all and the profit in pips (or pips). I don't care about pips and profits in general.
It's more convenient to use "pips" in tables - it's a short word.
here it has already been suggested: farts, peeps, cheburashka...
in ten years' time, another translator will write "farts" or "cheburashki" in MT :)
If Metacurrent point = Metacurrent pip, why did MQ introduce this term, why don't they want to continue using their point?
Probably because Metatrader has English in addition to Russian
Apparently because Metatrader has English in addition to Russian
yeah, by the way... this is a forced measure, it seems...
That's why no one from among the administration comments on the SABJ!!!
Once again, the role of bystanders... But when you're ready to wave your sword for nothing, you're welcome!
In general - of course - pips = points. If a four - mark, then it is a real POINT, if a five - mark, then it is not a real point, it must be multiplied by 10 to get 10 not real pips = 1 real with a three - five digit price quotation.