Points VS Pips - page 48
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is also a misnomer.
There is no description of pips anywhere in MT, because none of the developers understand the term)
pips are big numbers
(I'm reminded of Kuzma Prutkov: "If you see 'buffalo' on an elephant cage, don't believe your eyes.
)
One can't help but think of Kuzma Prutkov: "If you see 'buffalo' on an elephant cage, don't believe your eyes.
)
yes, that's true (
The main thing is that they don't even want to look into the matter - "it's all Cheburashka, we know everything".
Welcome to signal monitoring
What the hell does signal monitoring have to do with it? Yeah, MQ messed up there. They'll fix it. Did you see my poll? Have you finally realized that everyone interprets your pips differently? Why is your view of it "correct"? Apart from the rather far-fetched "there used to be 4 marks, and with the addition of the 5th, the last became a point and the penultimate became a pips" there is nothing! Bullshit...
yes, that's true (
And the main thing is that they don't even want to look into the matter - "it's all a bunch of hogwash, we already know everything".
And you didn't even understand why you mentioned Kuzma )))))))))
And you didn't even understand why Kuzma was mentioned )))))))))
neither do you)
What the hell does signal monitoring have to do with it? MQ's messed up there. They'll fix it. Did you see my poll? Have you finally realized that everyone interprets your pips differently? Why is your view of it "correct"? Apart from the rather far-fetched "there used to be 4 marks, and with the addition of the 5th, the last became a point and the penultimate became a pips" there is nothing! Bullshit...
I remember! To profitability?
What the hell does signal monitoring have to do with it? MQ's messed up there. They'll fix it. Did you see my poll? Have you finally realized that everyone interprets your pips differently? Why is your view of it "correct"? Apart from the rather far-fetched "there used to be 4 marks, and with the addition of the 5th, the last became a point and the penultimate became a pips" there is nothing! Bullshit...
The correct view is that of the one who created the term - English speakers.
Familiarise yourself with the definitions (just forget about the existence of the clause in MT for a while).
Naturally. Did you know there's more pippets?
I voted for the third option.
I never doubted it))
Naturally. Do you know that there are also pippets?
There you go. Let's make a swamp so that no one understands anything at all. Is it easier to fish in troubled waters? )))