trader's exam - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Most traders do not know how to set goals...
Tell me why trader should know pricing if he ( trader ) can not influence this process, or even one of hundreds of parameters that are related to pricing...
Or another example: Most traders are trying to guess the future price of currency pairs ... But this is nonsense, with so many different parameters ...
Although traders remember their main goal - to make profit..., but after that it's "who knows what to do... and everything is beside the point...".
P.S. I support Dimitry, because properly defined task is half of its solution...
Are they trying to guess the price? No way. Maybe the direction?
You hear a granny at the bazaar, and I read the scientific literature. Scientific literature is confirmed by practice. Draw a figure with 5, 7, 9, 11 points and with 6, 8, 10, 12 points and verify by experience. More to explain, what is experiential or what is R&D?
Do you read science-fiction literature or have you experienced that"the problem has no solution in the first place"...?
Or maybe this nonsense was suggested to you by R&D...?
Keep dreaming, Reader!
Who says there has to be a one-size-fits-all solution? There are different kinds of science: natural sciences and humanities.
Do you read science-fiction literature or have you experienced that"the problem has no solution in the first place"...?
Or maybe it was the R&D that told you this nonsense...?
Dream on, Reader!
In short, do you have nothing to say? Have you carried out an experiment?
Who says there has to be a one-size-fits-all solution? There are different kinds of science: natural sciences and humanities.
So what about philosophy, are you still of the opinion that it is a science? Just asking.
In short, you have nothing to say? Did you do an experiment?
Ridiculous!!!
There is a flat graph in two coordinates, where a curved line is drawn...
But then Reader comes along and states that he can't handle this graph with R&D..., and DOES, on that basis, state that"the problem has no solution in the first place"...
Isn't that ridiculous?...
So what about philosophy, do you still think it's a science? Just asking.
No, no, it's just that maths is no longer a science. But that doesn't bother me at all.
Ridiculous!!!
There is a flat graph in two coordinates, where a curved line is drawn...
But then Reader comes along and states that he can't handle this graph with R&D..., and DID, on that basis, state that"the problem has no solution in the first place"...
Isn't that ridiculous?...
1. Funny is an emotional category.
2. I did not state that there is no trading solution. I made a hypothesis that there may not be a solution. Do you distinguish hypothesis from assertion?
3. A hypothesis is confirmed or disproved by practice.
4 And the fact that there are problems which have no solution is not a hypothesis. I gave you an example of such a problem.
No, no, it's just that maths is no longer a science. But that doesn't bother me at all.
The question is about one thing, the answer is another.