A purely theoretical question for mathematicians. With the possibility of moving to the practical plane. - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
ahhh...
By the way, the Internet is littered with such
Great, so. we're on the right track. Guide them to the correct interpretation of this expression, not forgetting the virtual prices. Please cite. the link you like best.
Great, so. we are on the right track. Guide them in interpreting this expression correctly, not forgetting the virtual prices. Please give me the link you like best.
I don't like it, because econometrics doesn't work in financial markets.
a more advanced version of econometrics is now neural networks
no one has yet shown satisfactory results in neural network trading.
Prove otherwise by presenting practical trading results, and perhaps someone will start reading this whole piece of writing.The series given in the first post is purely abstract.
The real series looks like this:
or as follows
The message was that any series can be continued by making assumptions about its "character".
Of course each of us can only make assumptions about those "characters" with which we are familiar. )))
Some believe that there are boundary conditions that give a "universal law", perhaps you have this information, formulate it. ))
The second question from your first post, unfortunately, is not clear to me at all. (
.......
Some believe there are boundary conditions that give a "universal law", perhaps you have this information, articulate. ))
The second question from your first post, unfortunately, is not clear to me at all.
no one liked it, because econometrics does not work in financial markets
a more advanced version of econometrics at present is neural networks
no one has yet shown satisfactory results for neural network trading.
Prove otherwise by presenting practical trading results, and perhaps someone will start reading this whole piece of writing.For some reason everyone immediately asks for a trading history when someone describes a method. What will it tell you? You don't need trading history to evaluate a method of analysis, you don't even need the market for that. What does the trading history give you, nothing? Vaughn's signals are full of stories.
Theory without practice is just a lot of air pollution, nothing more.
But to move into practice, you have to develop a theory first. Or am I misunderstanding something?
But to move into practice, you have to develop a theory first. Or am I missing something?
A 100-page thread, not enough to publish an elementary econometric formula...
Another one...