The Sultonov system indicator - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thank you, Renat, I looked it up and of course I didn't understand anything, just like you don't understand Chinese.
I understand Chinese, as there is a translator.
The same way they deal with MQL, because there is documentation.
I would also like to add that no indicator, no matter how clever, will not save you from losing.
In addition to the indicator, you need to work on the Expert Advisor for a long time.
No programmer is going to support the refinement of a strategy for several years.
This is why I strongly recommend to start your own creative work.
Do you already have the formulas and ToR ready?
I just don't understand why you can't order it from the marketplace if you have everything?
If you want it for free, then you can post an Excel spreadsheet with automated calculations - it would be much clearer.
Dear forum members, as a basis for future indicator strategy let's consider and discuss the following hypothesis: The price of the current bar depends on 4 price values of previous bars according to the following relationship
C5 = C0 + a1C1 + a2C2 + a3C3 + a4C4
You may ask why it depends on 4? The point is that, so far, I am able to solve this equation up to 4 variables, the calculated formulas of which I gave earlier:https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/86249/page3
Let's analyze the behavior of 5 ratios, maybe we will come to some hints to a certain regularity.
In spite of the sharp market movement upwards, the indicator remains unperturbed, it considers this movement to be deceptive, firmly continues its verdict SELL and turns out to be right!
Apparently, for five starting points the result is no different from solving an ordinary system of linear equations, which can easily be solved for a dozen variables.
If there are more starting points, the result is even worse than using the method of least squares.
...
Give a concrete, practical and realistic example of making a system of levels.
Something tells me that the system will be unsolvable.
Greetings!
Trying to see the market in two dimensions.
You need to see the market in three dimensions - in depth.
Without volumes the task cannot be solved. Because each bar has a different tick weight and different speed.
And a small bar may have more weight than the neighbour ones that look bigger.
Give a concrete, practical and realistic example of a system of levels.
Something tells me that the system will be unsolvable.
OK, Dimitri. Suppose we have a continuous stream of opening prices (or any of the 4 bars of OCHL) history of an instrument:
We break down this flow into the following 5 systems of equations with 4 variables:
1st system:
a0+a11,1376+a21,1377+a31,1375+a41,1361=1,1358
a0+a11,1377+a21,1375+a31,1361+a41,1358=1,1354
a0+a11,1375+a21,1361+a31,1358+a41,1354=1,1357
a0+a11,1361+a21,1358+a31,1354+a41,1357=1,1358
a0+a11,1358+a21,1354+a31,1357+a41,1358=1,1356
2nd system:
a0+a11,1377+a21,1375+a31,1361+a41,1358=1,1354
a0+a11,1375+a21,1361+a31,1358+a41,1354=1,1357
a0+a11,1361+a21,1358+a31,1354+a41,1357=1,1358
a0+a11,1358+a21,1354+a31,1357+a41,1358=1,1356
a0+a11,1354+a21,1357+a31,1358+a41,1356=1.1367
We create the 3rd, 4th and 5th systems of equations by the same principle.
3rd system (computer version):
4th system:
5th system:
Solving all 5 systems with 13 price values, we find all 5 unknown coefficients unambiguously:
1st system:
a0+a11,1377+a21,1375+a31,1361+a41,1358=1,1354
a0+a11,1375+a21,1361+a31,1358+a41,1354=1,1357
a0+a11,1361+a21,1358+a31,1354+a41,1357=1,1358
a0+a11,1358+a21,1354+a31,1357+a41,1358=1,1356
a0+a11,1354+a21,1357+a31,1358+a41,1356=1.1367
We create the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th systems of equations according to this principle:
2nd system (computer version)
3rd system:
4th system:
Solving the new system, we find new coefficients:
If you read the first post carefully, you will see that I may have hit on the trail of the leading indicator.
No indicator looks into the future, no matter what you call it
SIS does not look into the future, but determines the true current state of the market, which inevitably results in its more likely movement in the future and this is confirmed by examples of its application. Nevertheless, let us wait and see its behaviour in the terminal.
No indicator can see into the future, whatever you call it
Based on the most complete currency basket, it might (for a while).
No indicator can look into the future, no matter what you call it
The future can be predicted.
The weather, for example, is predicted for a day or two or three days quite accurately.
It is a complex process just like the markets.