The best processors are the best in the world - General

Aleksey Vyazmikin 2019.03.27 22:56 #181

Laptop, well for statistics

CPUGrouping		Description	IP	PR	Passes	Revenue	Created	Activity

	Intel Core i5 M 450 @ 2.40GHz, 3766MB, build 2007	---	*...*	99	0	0.00	2019.03.27	2019.03.27

Maxim Romanov 2019.03.28 07:11 #182

So far the figures are really strange, the spread is large, but the treadripper is way ahead. I wish more Intel processors were available. Although the difference between two identical FX is the same as the difference between the best FX and treadripper. Maybe of course the ranking is non-linear, but then the results are even stranger.

MetaTrader 4 Build 529 xeon proccessor Optimise an EA and

Fast235 2019.03.28 07:18 #183

You just have to ask Renat if PR is even a good guide to choosing a processor, who knows what it takes into account

We should make a single-core tester using different calculations and conversions

Public discussion of the Strategy based on the Pricing policy for providing

Vladislav Andruschenko 2019.03.28 07:47 #184

Intel's is not plugging in yet.

Fast235 2019.03.28 08:00 #185

Aleksey Vyazmikin 2019.03.28 12:02 #186

And here are the optimisation results, in order to estimate the real difference in performance

You can see that my base PC FX-8350 which got PR 101 is 20-25% faster than the other FX-8350 which got PR125 rating.

At the same time the Phenom II 960T is already 35% slower with a better PR rating of 119.

The optimization time took 1 hour 23 minutes, it was not to confuse the number of passes, just in each pass of 1000 frames - Mathematical Computation mode. Agents started almost synchronously, well, a maximum of 0.3 passes difference.

On this PR rating depends, in general, the income and expenditure of cloud users, so would really like to get comments @Renat Fatkhullin.

Is there a pattern Evaluating CPU cores for Cloud Optimization yields very

Maxim Romanov 2019.03.28 12:10 #187

Aleksey Vyazmikin:

And here are the optimisation results, in order to estimate the real difference in performance

You can see that my base PC FX-8350 which got PR 101 is 20-25% faster than the other FX-8350 which got PR125 rating.

At the same time the Phenom II 960T is already 35% slower with a better PR rating of 119.

The optimization time took 1 hour 23 minutes, it was not to confuse the number of passes, just in each pass of 1000 frames - Mathematical Computation mode. Agents started almost synchronously, well, a maximum of 0.3 passes difference.

On this PR rating depends, in general, the income and expenditure of claud users, so would really like to get a comment @Renat Fatkhullin.

it turns out PR results are totally inadequate for evaluating real performance.

Aleksey Vyazmikin 2019.03.28 12:14 #188

Maxim Romanov:

the PR results are totally inadequate for assessing real performance.

If memory serves me correctly, Renat said a long time ago that PR can change after processing real jobs. Maybe then it would be more adequate, but how to get these jobs with such PR is a mystery.

Questions from Beginners MQL5 Withdrawal paypal - > Adaptive lookback indicators

Aleksey Vyazmikin 2019.03.28 14:31 #189

We continue to wonder, of all the majority of agents, Cloud has finally given the assignment - to the weakest!

Active in the last 24 hours

CPUGrouping		Description	IP	PR	Passes	Revenue	Created	Activity

	Intel Core i5 M 450 @ 2.40GHz, 3766MB, build 2007	---	*...*	101	2	0.00	2019.03.27	2019.03.28

At the same time raised his PR.

Rules to calculate Agents' MetaTrader 5 Strategy Tester Cloud Network

Danilych 2019.04.16 04:03 #190

ThreadRipper 1920X - PR 140-143

I want to build a PC to work with MT5, what do you advise and why? - page 19