You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Ok. But you should still think about abstract methods. Without them, everything looks very unreliable.
I'm thinking in the direction of such a sublanguage without explicit typing at all. Only at runtime. I don't think a well-tuned architecture of this type would lead to errors.
I don't believe that a well-tuned architecture of this type will lead to errors.
I don't believe that a well-tuned architecture of this type will lead to errors.
This is about the comrade's concern that run-time errors are too unreliable a benchmark for good program debugging
I'm thinking in the direction of such a sublanguage without explicit typing at all. Only at runtime. I don't think that a well-tuned architecture of this type would lead to errors.
This is about the comrade's concern that run-time errors are too unreliable a benchmark for quality program debugging
Ilya, if only there were something to debug...
But this is a futile point. Lack of typing is an evil. There are certainly lamer languages without it, but this is something to get away from, not to strive for. The more the compiler swears at you, the better, it means that you are on the right track.
We are not writing orbital control stations here, but rather simple, stereotyped and formulaic solutions that differ little from one another. In this context, the lack of strict type control, and instead maximum convenience is just what the doctor ordered. Fans of all sorts of neural networks and GPU operations support may rest easy. So can the adepts of maximum performance.
In this context, the lack of strict type control and instead maximum convenience is just what the doctor ordered
By the way, MQL already lacks type checking of pointers. A base pointer implicitly casts to a derived one, which should not happen.
We are not writing orbital control stations here, but rather simple, stereotyped and formulaic solutions that differ little from one another. In this context, the lack of strict type control, and instead maximum convenience is just what the doctor ordered. Fans of all sorts of neural networks and GPU operations support may rest easy. So can the adepts of maximum productivity.
the prospects of complex projects with neural networks, GPUs, etc. for languages with dynamic typing, like Python, where there are no explicit programming difficulties
You probably meant to say: where you don't need to be a programmer) In fact, languages designed for dummies. And these languages are essentially just a shell, calling some or other code written in normal programming languages.