- What I would like from the "terminal" as a professional programmer. Another thread with wishes for MQL5.
- Trend of interesting thoughts
- Non-dynamic trading.
Using methods to identify price corridors, to open trades on the borders of the channel on the trend.
So, you use a candlestick price indicator, a price corridor detection indicator, and a tick volume indicator, and you call your trading "candlestick-free"?
So, you use a candlestick price indicator, price corridor detection indicator, tick volume indicator - and you call your trading system "without indicator"?
Yes, I described an auxiliary tool of the system. That's all. And the trading itself is based on the pendulum principle. And it gives 90%-95% results. Therefore, I dare to consider it practically unsyndicatorial in terms of the pendulum.
Well, how can it be unsyndicatorial? On the other hand, call it what you like. The main thing is the result. And 90% is just a crazy good result. Open a signal, and in six months of such trading - you will have at least a thousand subscribers.
Well, how can it be syndicatorless? On the other hand, call it what you like. The main thing is the result. And 90% is just a crazy good result. Open a signal, and after six months of such trading, you will have at least a thousand subscribers.
I use pendulum with statistical calculation of lots depending on deposit + I use methods of price corridors detecting to open deals at any boundary of a channel in price direction.
Is the pendulum like "avalanche" or "chuburashka" or something else? As for100-150% profit per year, that's a good result if it's stable.
Any TS can be described as indicatorless. In its essence, an indicator is nothing more than tracing market history and calculating / drawing a certain conclusion. Which is done from a purely visual analysis. Just all calculations are done on the fly of what is seen on the chart history.
I would argue here, not all TCs look backwards. Sometimes only what is under 'feet' is evaluated.
Is the pendulum like an 'avalanche' or a 'chaebol' or something else? As for100-150% profit per year, that's a good result if it's stable.
Yes, like a cheburashka or whatever it's called))
Stable means that the average drawdown is about 15% and the maximum does not exceed 30%.
But the most interesting thing is that even such a thing seemed to be extremely difficult to do ... that is, to make it completely controllable processes like risk control, control the probability of profit depending on market conditions and know what to take from the market to put in dependence on it ... and it all worked like clockwork.
I'm not even talking about what people are trying to do here.... It's just unrealistic when the real price movements of 60-70% are covered by noise, and it's almost impossible to take profit from the last 30% movement, unless you know about it beforehand in some magic way. The way I see it...
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use