Record on the Market - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It looks like with the minimum price is no longer $30. If you open "Market -> MetaTrader 5 -> New", there are products at $15.
And if you look closely - $15 is the rent.
I would make it compulsory. If the author of the product doesn't have a real account frozen here within a month, the product is automatically deleted.
It's already full of tester grails. And now it's going to get fucked up.
I would make it compulsory. If the author of the product doesn't have a real account frozen here within a month, the product is automatically deleted.
It's already full of tester grails. And now it's going to be fucked.
It's not technically feasible.
Well, the inconvenience of finding new quality products will probably arise at some point. I don't disagree. But I think you're exaggerating a bit. It's no big deal. Everything will work out in the marketplace. In addition, the newcomers also need to give a chance to be in the top. Again, an incentive to grow.
I'm not exaggerating, I'm just writing from the position of a developer. I'm not against giving newcomers a chance. But it doesn't have to be here, where programs sell for a lot of money. We were all newbies, myself included. But it is unethical to sell a product made unprofessionally and with mistakes. A beginner becomes a professional if you want to.
If the results of professionals' work are diluted with the flaws of beginners and forced to compete with them, professionals will eventually simply leave. I, too, will leave for other projects. And all that will be left here are the "learning results" of newcomers. Thus, a surge in the number of publications will at first have a small effect in the form of a small profit for the administration, and then, as the quality of the product degenerates, there will be a profound crisis of loss of reputation for the project. It is strange why the administration does not see this. They seem to be intelligent people, but with their own hands they are ruining their brainchild.
The quality of MQL programs is far from reaching its peak.
The peak has passed, the era of spam and consumerism has arrived.
Maybe. No argument there. The quality of MQL programs is far from reaching its peak. For it to reach its peak, it needs competition.
In a marketplace, there can't be any competition in terms of product quality. By the picture, by the cover, by the image - yes, but what lies behind the beautiful cover? By the time all the faults of one such "beautiful" product are exposed, there will be other similar products. And one or two good products will simply be lost in the growing pile of mediocrity or outright rejects.
I understand why the SD was closed - you can hardly believe how many questions appeared on the forum. Each time the quality of questions gets worse and worse, and this flow is increasing. And now such koduns have a quick and easy way to the market...
After all, a programmer who cares about the quality of his product and his name, can not stamp his handicrafts at the speed of a sewing machine. He is primarily concerned with quality, not quantity. But those who have an urgent need to make a quantity will not think about quality.
And how can one find a quality product among a mountain of beautiful rubbish if the code is locked? Only by buying it, twisting it around and realizing that it is ... junk. And then what? Go back to buying, checking, throwing out again until you come across a good product. For the end buyer of a normal product, its cost will increase due to the forced search.
I'm not exaggerating, just writing from a developer's perspective. I am not against giving way to newcomers. But it shouldn't be here, where programs are sold for a lot of money. We were all newbies, myself included. But it is unethical to sell a product made unprofessionally and with mistakes. A beginner becomes a professional if you want to.
If you dilute the results of professionals' work with the flaws of beginners and force them to compete with them, the professionals will eventually just leave. I, too, will leave for other projects. And all that will be left here are the "learning results" of newcomers. Thus, the upsurge in the number of publications will at first have a small effect in the form of a small profit for the administration, and then, as the quality of the product degenerates, there will be a profound crisis of the loss of the project's reputation.
You know, I am a developer too. Of course, my reasoning is purely from my own point of view. I don't feel any danger in the influx of junk. So what if there's more junk... The front page of Market is always open for us. If I was counting on the second or third page of Market, I'd get worried. But this is not an option for me. Therefore, I am calm. I think every confident developer, ready to continue to grow creatively and do better and better, will be calm that a crowd of clueless people will come and take his place. That's not going to happen.
Maybe. No argument there. The quality of MQL programs is far from reaching its peak. For it to reach its peak, it needs competition.
I didn't want to bring up this subject, but I have to.
The quality of MQL-programs will reach its peak when this quality will be measured by a specialist, not by a customer.
Both in the Market and Job, the institute of experts appointed by customers themselves should be introduced.
In the marketplace, you cannot compete in the first place on the quality of the product. By picture, by cover, by appearance, yes, but what lies behind the beautiful cover? By the time all the faults of one such "beautiful" product are exposed, there will be other similar products. And one or two good products will simply be lost in the growing pile of mediocrity or outright rejects.
I can understand why the CD was closed - it's amazing how many questions appeared on the forum. Each time the quality of questions gets worse and worse, and this flow is increasing. And now such coduns have a quick and easy way to the market...
After all, a programmer who cares about the quality of his product and his name, can not stamp his handicrafts at the speed of a sewing machine. He is primarily concerned with quality, not quantity. Those who have an urgent need to make quantities will not think about quality.
And how can one find a quality product among a mountain of beautiful rubbish if the code is locked? Only by buying it, twisting it around and realizing that it is ... junk. And then what? Go back to buying, checking, throwing out again until you come across a good product. For the end buyer of a normal product, its cost will increase due to the forced search.
The division of products into "junk" and "junk" is the user's prerogative. We, the developers, cannot force their products on the user by saying that our product is "trash! The user has to draw that conclusion himself. And if we get lost in the crowd of mediocrities, it means that we ourselves are mediocrity. That's my logic.
You know, I am also a developer. Of course, I'm speaking from my own bell tower. I don't feel there's any danger in an influx of junk. So what if there's more junk... The front page of Market is always open for us. If I was counting on the second or third page of Market, I'd get worried. But this is not an option for me. Therefore, I am calm. I think every confident developer, ready to continue to grow creatively and do better and better, will be calm that a crowd of clueless people will come and take his place. That's not going to happen.
Time will tell who is right and who is right. It would simply be a pity if this wonderful project were to be ruined by sudden, ill-conceived moves. You have to act more smoothly, and always look at the results. As it is, acting like an elephant in a china shop makes it very easy to destroy a delicate equilibrium tied to a multitude of unformalisable factors.