How are you with a market mindset? - page 13

 
Petros Shatakhtsyan:


Oleg, please tell me how Relative Drawdown = 0.00% on this report.

Is that possible ???

Strange question... This is an actual MT4 terminal report. are you doubting its possibility ???

 
Олег avtomat:

Strange question... This is an actual MT4 terminal report. Are you doubting its capability???

I don't trade on MT4.

Such charts and reports do not show relative drawdown by funds. And such results do not tell us anything.


P.S. On MT5 this line is written as"Balance Drawdown Relative"

 
Martin Cheguevara:

1718 1782 1704 1635 1696 1604 1669 1720 1618 1565 1620 1708 1661 1624 1573 1502 1613 1560 1498 1525 1635 1623 1619 1619 1545 1493 1468 1406 1478 1414 1524 1541 1607 1636 1701 1648 1597 1588 1549 1556 1534 1528 1537 1567 1660 1672 1616 1631 1604 1664 1638 1628 1688 1777 1880 1832 1749 1705 1802 1856 1831 1913 1983 2026 2105 2173 2282 2397 2444 2530 2601 2542 2442 2480 2533 2605 2549 2460 2585 2659 2587 2611 2557 2474 2469 2576 2486 2524 2465 2515 2519 2523


220 221 221 221 221 220 219 219 220 220 220 220 220 222 222 223 224 229 228 227 227 228 230 229 228 228 229 228 228 227 228 228 227 225 224 225 226 225 230 229 229 227 227 229 229 227 226 223 223 220 218 219 216 218 219 223 221 217 216 219 218 219 218 221 220 221 222 222 223 222 224 223 222 221 221 222 222 222 221 222 218 218 219 219 221 220 221 219 221 222 221 221 222 220 220 220 220 220 219 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 221 218 219 219 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 224

Define)

Firstly, I can and will waste my time, which is not the same thing. Secondly, it is not a statistically valid sample, you need at least 5000 data.
 
Maxim Romanov:
Firstly, I can and will waste my time, which is not the same thing. Secondly, it's not a statistically correct sample, you need at least 5000 data.
Why 5000?) Interesting))) hmmm...you seem to be thinking correctly) well, why is that anyway?
 
Petros Shatakhtsyan:

I don't trade on MT4.

These charts and reports don't show relative drawdown by funds. And these results don't tell me anything.


P.S. On MT5 this line is written as"Balance Drawdown Relative"

It's better not to write ... All to no avail ... unfortunately ...
 
Petros Shatakhtsyan:

I don't trade on MT4.

These charts and reports don't show relative drawdown by funds. And these results don't tell me anything.


P.S. On MT5 this line is written as"Balance Drawdown Relative".

In MT4 reports the drawdown is counted by means. At least in the tester it is exact, because I myself count during testing to determine the time and date of this drawdown.

 
Martin Cheguevara:
And why 5000?) I wonder)) hmmm...you seem to be thinking correctly) well, why is that anyway?:)
You need to plot the probability distribution of the increments there and you can see everything at once. Why 5000? If it's minutes, then it's approximately 3.5 days, during which time the deviation will definitely show up. If it is ticks, it will also show up. In general, the larger the better, but when I dealt with this issue, I found out experimentally that the trend is usually visible from 1000 of data. And the market can behave for some time very similar to a random process, so it is better with some reserve.
 
khorosh:

In MT4 reports the drawdown is counted by means. At least in the tester it is accurate, because I myself count during testing to determine the time and date of this drawdown.

Yes, in the MT5 tester during testing the drawdown is counted by equity too, and in MT reports only by balance.

To specify the maximal drawdown by equity in terminal reports, one should go through all deals and calculate the drawdown by equity using real ticks from the beginning of the report.

It is not calculated in the signals either. If there were deals before the signal was created, the drawdown by equity is shown as 0 %.

But it is surprising that this drawback has not been solved so far.

 
Aleksey Nikolayev:

As far as I know, they usually talk about the coefficient of elasticity of demand, supply (or whatever) as a function of something else. It's essentially just the first derivative (just replacing the variables with their logarithms). How does your elasticity coefficient relate to this standard concept?

Have a look at the above article, it's all explained. And its physical meaning, indeed, means the first derivative of income from price - by how many roubles the income will change if the selling price of the commodity changes by 1 rouble. Consequently, it is a dimensionless quantity.

 
Maxim Romanov:
You need to plot the probability distribution of the increments there and you can see everything at a glance. Why 5000? If it is minutes, it will be approximately 3.5 days, during which time the deviation will definitely show up. If it is ticks, it will also show up. In general, the larger the better, but when I dealt with this issue, I found out experimentally that the trend is usually visible from 1000 of data. And the market can behave for some time very similar to a random process, so it is better with some reserve.

2500 is more than enough) Some statistical parameters come to a "stable" state over this period.