The psychology of the successful trader. - page 19
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Must be psychologically difficult for this office's customers...
Новости
25 January 2018
Refund applications will be collected in February 2018. For other questions, please contact the company's interim manager at the contacts listed on the company's official website.
Rebranding
Due to an unscheduled restructuring in 2017, the company's financial condition deteriorated significantly, which led to an outflow of client capital, a decline in trading turnover and, consequently, overall revenue declined to a critical level. At the Extraordinary General Meeting the shareholders decided to terminate the current operations, appoint a temporary administration, return cash to clients and rebrand the company.
Please note that all procedures related to the bankruptcy of the company are conducted in accordance with international law. The relevant information is published only on the official website, all other sources could be considered unreliable.
Contact
If you have any queries or questions, please write to the company's interim administrator at ...@...com.
In my incompetent opinion, if you are searching for an effective trading system, you should adjust this TS to your character. That is, a sanguine person with his high mental activity and impatience should not engage in long term trading. And the phlegmatic with his slowness should not engage in scalping.
The terminal is just fine. I have no such thing as psychology.
You, on the other hand, are clearly over-excited. Why is that? It's obvious psychology bothers you and you want to talk about it.
Once again. No technology, no psychology. No technology - there is psychology and all sorts of worries such as - market went the wrong way, brokerage house is after my stops, etc.
So I do not deny that I, unlike you (who have achieved perfection, judging by your words), am far from psychological perfection. And there are many people here who honestly say that this topic is close and understandable to them (also unlike you).
Well, as for "the market has gone in the wrong direction" (and to blame someone), as you point out, I have long since moved away from the "baby talk".
And, by the way, I am voting for the development of technology with all my hands.I do not deny that I, unlike you (who have achieved perfection, judging by your words), am far from psychological perfection. And there are many people here who honestly say that this subject is close and clear to them (also unlike you).
Well as for "the market has gone wrong" (and to blame someone), as you write, I have long since moved away from the "childish snot" state.
Don't swear, physicists! People will look at you and say - what a bunch of people study at physics departments :)))
So you're being pushed around, you have to respond. Otherwise, you're going to get jammed up.
I do not deny that I, unlike you (who have achieved perfection, judging by your words), am far from psychological perfection. And there are many people here who honestly say that this topic is close and understandable to them (also unlike you).
But about that "the market went in the wrong direction" (and to blame someone), as you say, I have long moved away from the state of "childish snot".
I'm not talking about perfection, I'm talking about the process. Whether the technology is perfect or not is another question. There is technology - we comply, formal procedure.
Bad technology - we look for flaws and make improvements. You can use demo or virtual transactions.
As an example. Let's say, I haven't traded Gold for a long time. For example, I spend a day just staring at it, trying to estimate something. And on the next day I take a piece of paper and use it to make virtual trades. When everything is fine-tuned, I start playing, first with one futures. If after a few trades all is OK, I can go to a full volume.
They are on the "other side of the barricades" in either case, be it "kitchen" or "non-cookery".
And since they are two sides of the same coin, we can assume that
P1 * P2 = 1
Thus we start mathematization of trading psychology ;)))
That's what I wrote, complicated psychology of a successful trader must be. This is why we can't be sure of the correctness of these equations.
A suitable model to describe this interaction (or confrontation) and obtain a qualitative picture would be a predator-prey model in one of its not very sophisticated versions.
and the original topic is slowly turning... slowly turning...