From theory to practice - page 1890
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hard to disagree;)
If you watch the signals carefully, you can see a pattern.
Before billing to the signals, profits are rising. As soon as you put it into signals, the poker bends.
Conclusion:
The more subscribers' money hangs in the account, the harder it will be to manage the account.
Concentration of liquidity does its job. There will be tough guys happy to take that liquidity.
Renat, you're 100% right)). Only money works, or rather against it.
Those who need liquidity may subscribe to signals. They just go for ready liquidity.
Have a nice trade)))
For beginners: signals are not PAMM
The point is the same - the leader leads the herd to the slaughter.
The point is the same - the leader leads the herd to the slaughter.
What's with the cockerel lashing out at everybody? In all the branches.
He's already got one feather on his tail.) And he's twitching)))
What's with the cockerel lashing out at everybody? In all the branches.
He's already got one feather on his tail.) He's twitching)))
In short, AK is dead wrong about thinning out the ticks, oh for nothing.
At the time, when asking for a ticking history from MQ, the answers from their representatives were among other things: "f*ck you".
Who would have thought that ticks can tell a lot about....
For example, exactly how the price moved.
Let's draw a minute candlestick - how the price moved there?
Without the tick history it's not clear at all.
But the real quote is fluffy and she is right, strange as it may seem.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/152878#comment_3782268
In short, AK is extremely wrong that he cuts the ticks, oh in vain.
I once posted a program that generates "ticks" with a simple algorithm with memory.
The distribution is of course uneven.
And it was possible to win with ticks there, because the algorithm was simple and the way to win was clear.
But if we thin out the ticks, for example every second tick, our winning becomes ephemeral. Also, if you group the ticks even by 3.
If you make bars, it becomes unreal to win on them
and that's with a predetermined generator algorithm and distribution
In short, AK is dead wrong about thinning out the ticks, oh for nothing.
At the time, when asking for a ticking history from MQ, the answers from their representatives were among other things: "f*ck you".
Who would have thought ticks could tell a lot....
For example, exactly how the price moved.
Let's draw a minute candlestick - how the price moved there?
Without a tick story, it's not clear at all.
And the actual quote is fluffy and she's right, oddly enough.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/152878#comment_3782268
Fountain of rainbows))))) unstoppable... Where's the bottom line? ))))
Bagala ran over)))) Price runs everywhere. Then the dough comes in and rolls...........
If you're analysing the pre-New Year's market, it's not the market for the whole year.) It's a bacchanalia of supply and demand.........
Come mm and analyse ticks to the seventh knee)))))))
Fountain of rainbows))))) unstoppable... Where's the bottom line? ))))
Bagala Runs Over)))) Price runs everywhere. Then the dough comes in and rolls...........
If you're analysing the pre-New Year's market, it's not the market for the whole year.) It's a bacchanalia of supply and demand.........
Come mm and analyse ticks to the seventh knee)))))))
yeah,I got it all.
ran it before new year, they asked me to hold off....
stopped by
So I've been doing this and that for a while now.
In short, AK is dead wrong about thinning out ticks, oh for nothing.
At the time, when asking for a ticking history from MQ, the answers from their representatives were among other things: "f*ck you".
Who would have thought that ticks could tell a lot....
For example, exactly how the price moved.
Let's draw a minute candlestick - how the price moved there?
Without the tick story, it's not clear at all.
And the real quote is fluffy and she is right, oddly enough.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/152878#comment_3782268
Maybe you weren't paying attention. But it only thins ticks with the same price. This is useful in the sense of easing the chart.
But his strategy is hindered by the construction of the oscillator. Figuratively a 100hastic. With all its flaws.
To look at the market more broadly he is not mature enough yet. It takes time.