From theory to practice - page 1447
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
All in all, a lot of things are right.
- The price takes into account everything, including news
- the random component is also there (let's call it a liquidity game against obvious signals), otherwise everyone would earn
- also in case of an incorrect technical analysis there will be a consistent loss.
- Pattern analysis will not give anything, because you need to analyze and compare the previous ticks
- the absorption will work, because it will detect a flat / trend, again with some lag
with all that it implies
There's a thing called mathematical statistics, and there's a thing called probability theory.
And in it is the probability distribution.
and there's the RMS (standard deviation - sigmas)
So go learn statistics.
If only you were the only one...there are hundreds of such ignoramuses...all with both stupid questions and stupid ideas.
theorist is part of matstatistics? they are actually separate sections, you fool. tv&ms.
so where is the proof, using statistics, that the market is 98% random and 2% consistent?
came up with some *** and is carrying it around like a fool with a cake.
so it's a truism, it's primitive.
theorist is part of matstatistics? they're actually separate sections, silly. tv&ms.
so where is the proof, with statistics, that the market is 98% random and 2% legitimate?
you come up with some *** and run with it like a fool.
Or look for trends and try to make money and you'll find out.
You talk about theorists, about trends, but you take from 2 to 6 pips in a signal. You do not believe in what you say?
You're arguing about theorists, about trends, while you take from 2 to 6 pips in a signal. You don't believe what you're saying?
I believe in what works and brings profit, no more and no less. everything else is essentially irrelevant.
I am very critical of any system, my own or someone else's.
And I'm only speculating on what I've really figured out.
By the way, after 800-900 pages of this thread my reasoning has not changed in any way and never will;)
As I said before, he who will not adhere to the plain truths I was talking about will be punished by his own stupidity.
Everyone has the right to try)
Came to the forum, wrote a couple of posts, asked a couple of questions... And now all of a sudden you're a stupid and clueless dunce.
All in all, a lot of things are right.
- The price takes into account everything, including news
- the random component is also there (let's call it a liquidity game against obvious signals), otherwise everyone would earn
- also in case of an incorrect technical analysis there will be a consistent loss.
- Pattern analysis will not give anything, because you need to analyze and compare the previous ticks
- the absorption will work, because it will detect a flat / trend, again with some lag
with all that it implies.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing
[Archive] [Archive] Learn how to make money!
new-rena, 2012.02.05 07:15
If we want to be sure of the correctness of such trading strategies, we should use the following approach: a) look at the Ask/Supply function (by simple parameter search). In our case - how much to buy and how much to sell. This too can be found.
The timeframe does not play a role, as there is a maximum and minimum price of a quote per its bar!!!!!
The tester's modelling quality is not relevant, due to the lack of parameters!!!!!
GRAAL IS READY !!!! GRAAL READY !!!! GRAAL READY !!!! GRAAL READY !!!! GRAAL READY !!!! GRAAL GOVERNMENT !!!! GRAAL GOVERNMENT !!!!
Strategy options no longer available
dashing 2012's...?)
dashing 2012's...?)
Renat Akhtyamov==new-rena ?