From theory to practice - page 1376

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

have you learned how to find it yet?


How should I know... I asked about the period - different period = different volume.

 

Something about 3.07 is not a good day for TC.

And for some reason he has already topped up his balance twice.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:

Something about 3.07 is not a good day for TC.

And for some reason he has already topped up his balance twice.

To rake in more money.
 
Evgeniy Chumakov:

Something about 3.07 is not a good day for the TS.

And for some reason I've already replenished the balance twice. (By the way, why?)

There monitoring does not show drawdown on equity, but only on closed trades or what?

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:

Something about 3.07 is not a good day for TC.

And for some reason he's already topped up his balance twice.

Flat is no joke.

 


it's interesting...

everything we do is a consequence of the object of observation...

we never intervene directly in the observation process itself.

But if we change this rule, then it becomes possible to predict even random values because observation and participation in a random process are two completely different almost unrelated concepts.

I'm not sure about anything so far, except the results I got.

This is simply amazing...and beautiful.

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:


it's interesting...

everything we do is a consequence of the object of observation...

we never intervene directly in the observation process itself.

But if we change this rule, then it becomes possible to predict even random values because observation and participation in a random process are two completely different almost unrelated concepts.

I'm not sure about anything so far, except the results I got.

This is simply amazing...and beautiful.

Go strictly with the current trend, fully reflecting its movement, and the final picture will be much prettier!

 
Good thing no one here will know what I'm talking about=)
 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:
Good thing no one here will know what I'm talking about=)

Good is good, but not good at all. There is no need for any additional prediction when trending, a previously tested and normally working algorithm is enough

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:
Good thing no one here will know what I'm talking about=)

I guess I know what I'm talking about.
We're all part of the same process, but watching the process
from the sidelines, we can't become participants. We're still observers.
That's the way it is.