From theory to practice - page 1369

 
Renat Akhtyamov:
that's for sure.
And not a word on the merits of the question...
 
aleger:
And not a word on the substance of the question...

what do you mean?

I already said it before

Especially since I don't know whether or not ZZ is redrawn, as I haven't worked with the zig-zag

my indy does not redraw as the trend is a line from A to B. How can it redraw, are you kidding me?

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

What do you mean?

I've said it before.

Moreover, I do not know if ZZ is overdrawn or not, as I have not worked with the zig-zag.
Well and in vain, ZZ is the most adequate (trendy!) model of forex operations
 
aleger:
And for good reason, ZZ is the most adequate (trending!) model for forex operations
So be it
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
So be it.

So we should use it rather than follow outdated dogma

 
aleger:

Then you should use it, not follow outdated dogma

use

I have my own way of doing things.

And the ending is definite, and with ZZ, you don't know what's going to happen next.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

use

I have my own approach

Do you have Skype?
 
aleger:
Do you have Skype?

Are you going to talk to me about ZZ?

No, I don't have Skype, and I'm not interested in ZZ.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Are you going to talk to me about ZZ?

No, I don't Skype.

It's a fresh story... but it's up to you... "If you don't want to, you don't have to, if you do, you won't"...
 
aleger:
It's a fresh story... but it's up to you... "If you don't want to, you don't have to, if you do, you won't"...
I won't, 1000%