From theory to practice - page 1365

New comment
 
20% at a landing of 5% is an excellent result. It's not going badly.
 

Well, anyway, I have written an Expert Advisor by Formula.

I stopped the test, in my opinion, two months, without parameters and reinvestments, without lot calculation, without martins and nets, just a test "on the fly"

Especially for non-believers FOM, practically all the time in the plus:


 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Well, I have written an Expert Advisor according to the Formula.

I stopped the test, for two months I think, without parameters and reinvestments, without calculating the lot, just a test "on the fly":

I'm sorry, Renat, but the entire Internet is full of such graphs about nothing. I, among others, have them. And so do others.
Suffice it to say, did it, tested it, seems OK. Without a description of the principles the chart is not necessary, and not interesting.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
I'm sorry, Renat, but the entire web is flooded with charts like this about nothing. And I, too, have similar ones.
It was enough to say that I made it, tested it, it seems OK. Without a description of the principles, the graph is unnecessary, and not interesting.

I knew it was ok, I just couldn't get my arms around writing the programme properly, my skull cracked, but I did it because it was different, not at all like the others and not the way they do it on the web.

The principle will be in the open sources, for free, I told you, but not here.

the funny thing is that the price reversal does not happen the way ZZ draws it

Chegevara only draws reversals correctly, but he didn't show that here.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

as things are different, not at all like everyone else.

How do you know what it's like? You can't know that.)
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Well, anyway, I wrote an Expert Advisor according to the Formula.

I stopped the test, in my opinion, two months, without parameters and reinvestments, without lot calculation, without martins and nets, just a test "on the fly"

Especially for non-believers FOM, practically all the time in the plus:


What if you run the test with a set lot size? For example, 1.0?

 
aleger:

And if you run the test with a set lot size? For example, 1.0?

I mean at the maximum, with reinvestment?

I already know it's going to hit the ceiling.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
How do you know how everyone else does? You can't know that.)

You're bluffing too.

By the way, the principle is to determine the volume of buying and selling from the price chart

If there are more purchases, we sell; if there are more sales, we buy.

;)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

So it's maxed out, what, with reinvestment?

I already know it's gonna hit the ceiling.

Not necessarily a reinvestment, just a single lot, you can do it in one week or even one day
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

You're bluffing too.

;)

Of course. A favourite pastime. ;)
"Also" is the key word here.)
1...135813591360136113621363136413651366136713681369137013711372...1981
New comment