
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I take it he hasn't come out for real?
He was just testing on the real one.
It wasn't me, it was Schrodinger's cat. Now let him tell me where the Grail is!
I am not interested in the Grail. )))
He was just testing in real life.
But the topic didn't develop?
But there has been no development of the topic?
It's evolving little by little, not what it was at the beginning and middle of the thread.I'm not interested in the Grail. )))
Okay. More seriously.
Investigated Wiener and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process models for their fit with the market for the "return to average" strategy.
The result on the real at the moment is "-3%" profit for 7 months of trading (about 100 trades).
Reason:
- Lack of market antipersistence parameter. Hurst coefficients, skewness and kurtosis of distributions are not working.
Now in operation:
1. Processhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance_gamma_process.
2. Gann theory.
And unfortunately. Until a concrete trading system from theory to practice seems to me to be out of the question...
Until a reliable parameter of market persistence/antipersistence is found, all is nonsense and flub.
Until a reliable parameter for market persistence/anti-persistence is found, all is nonsense and flub.
Until a reliable insider is found, it's all nonsense and flub.
there will be no insider on the forecourt
Otherwise it will turn out that buying does not equal selling and other tricks will come out...