From theory to practice - page 575
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, it's an interesting read.
I sometimes like to read something for science before going to bed, too).
Well, it's interesting to read.
People are alive, after all.)
I like to read something for science sometimes too).
I don't want to offend you again.
You need to promote your ideas now, not wait for the stardom that befell artists of yesteryear.
I don't want to offend you again.
You need to promote your ideas now, not wait for the stardom that befell artists of yesteryear.
That's what Cox and Oakes are doing. And quite successfully, I might add.
Is that all there is to it?
What suits me on m5 and gives a similar +/- couple of bars fromhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/86386/page1022#comment_8141534 does not fit the spirit of the scientific tension of this thread. "from theory to practice" for 500 pages has practically shown - catching knives for entries is not a worthwhile endeavour, what's the point of stalling in that direction. What would you like to see?
So Cox and Oakes are promoting it. And quite successfully, I must say.
If there are new ideas, what's to stop you getting ahead of them? I see only humble admirers.
If there are new ideas, what prevents you from getting ahead of them? I see only humble admirers.
That's A.K. He's gushing with them.
Recalled K. Prutkov's "Fruit of Thought" - If you have a fountain, shut it up; let the fountain rest too.
"from theory to practice" in 500 pages has practically shown - catching knives for inputs is not a worthwhile endeavour, what's the point of stalling in that direction
Friends, please plot a couple more histograms from these files.
From the first file:
What suits me on m5 and gives a similar +/- couple of bars ofhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/86386/page1022#comment_8141534 does not fit the spirit of the scientific tension of this thread. "from theory to practice" for 500 pages has practically shown - catching knives for entries is not a worthwhile endeavour, what's the point in stalling in that direction. What would you like to see?
If you take the science of financial markets from this thread, the result may not be entirely scientific, but purely experimental and not proven positive.
But your experiments are good. Even for me.