From theory to practice - page 422
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As a variant of calculating the size of stop-loss, if its size is specified in points. For example, if we set the stop-loss size at 100 points (5 digits), then we take into account only those ticks, when the price has passed this interval. I.e. we take the first tick = the last tick, the second = tick + - 100 points, the third = tick + - 100 points of the second tick, etc.
If I were TC, I would pay attention to this idea. Such thinning of ticks would greatly simplify the object in question - instead of a continuous process with continuous time - a discrete wandering on a one-dimensional grid.
I believe the probability is always 50%, either profit or loss.
As an option to calculate the size of a stop loss if its size is specified in pips. For example, if we set the stop-loss size at 100 points (5 digits), then we take into account only those ticks, when the price has passed this interval. So we take the first tick = the last tick, the second = tick + - 100 points, the third = tick + - 100 points of the second tick, etc.
Find the answer to the following question:
Price = ?
You will get the ratio.
Find the answer to the following question:
Price = ?
There will be a ratio for you.
Do you have an answer?
For a quick answer, it's like this:
https://www.oanda.com/lang/ru/forex-trading/analysis/open-position-ratios
I seem to have found another error in my calculations.
Read it carefully:
In our case x>>lambda and the central part of the wave packet does not resemble a normal distribution by its form but by its essence (if we look at the persentiles) with WIDE sigma=sqrt(c*t*lambda). Except for the "heavy" tails, of course.
Thus, the dispersion of our diffusion process is calculated according to the formula:
D=(c*t*lambda)/4
Use it, guys!!!
May the Grail be with us!
P.S. But it does not cancel the search for the "trend/flat" parameter. Searching...
By the way, watching another apparently losing EURUSD trade in real time, I officially declare:
Without the "trend/float" parameter there is nothing to do in the market
And since I do not have enough intelligence to find it, I have to resort to the last chance - to use the neuronet for searching for it.
I will be away from the forum for a while.
Good luck!
By the way, watching another apparently losing EURUSD trade in real time , I officially declare:
Without the "trend/float" parameter there is nothing to do in the market
And since I do not have enough intelligence to find it, I have to resort to the last chance - to use the neuronet for searching for it.
I will be away from the forum for a while.
Good luck!
Did you think it was possible to make a grail without a single losing trade? There is no such thing. You cannot do without stops. Try to gain a stable profitable trade by outweighing the number of profitable trades and TP>SL. This will be the grail.
No, it's too early to say goodbye.
Here are the charts for EURUSD this week, with variance calculation using the formula D=(c*t*lambda)/4
And here is another one with the secret parameter
So, if we look at charts 2 and 3, this is the desired Grail. А?
Without the trend/float parameter there is nothing to do in the marketAnd since I don't have the intelligence to find it, I have to resort to the last chance - using a neural network to find it.
Maybe if only to compare the pair with other currency pairs having the same symbols.
No, it's too early to say goodbye.
Here are the charts for EURUSD this week, with variance calculation using the formula D=(c*t*lambda)/4
And here is another one with the secret parameter
So, if we look at charts 2 and 3, this is the desired Grail. А?