From theory to practice - page 297
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Real tick data obtained this week for AUDCAD pair.
I ask interested persons to check the distribution of time intervals between price increments (column C)
Still - can we or cannot we call this an Erlang flow of 1st order?
Columns A and B are increments Bid and Ask respectively.
Calculated the increments of Bid. The exponent is also different.
Calculated the Bid increments. The exponent is also different.
What I am doing now is collecting a series of quotes in Erlang flow at k=1 and n=0.5. I pull a hidden real tick series and see that it is much closer to the normal distribution than the simple tick BP.
I've been twisting and turning this shell around and around.
Not so azure at the moment
I have already twisted it on the test. Showed in the thread a few pages ago (I can't find it). The system conceptually close to the A_K2. Implementation has nothing in common.
So far I have no plans to further develop or implement this system. Maybe closer to the fall.
This is what I do now - I collect a series of quotes in Erlang's flow at k=1 and n=0.5. I pull a hidden real tick series and see that it is much closer to the normal distribution than the simple tick BP.
I told you that you won't manage before the New Year and you won't leave the forum. It's not pessimism, I just know what I'm saying.
I don't think I'll be finished with forex before the New Year and I won't be here again.
When the symptoms of addiction appear, go to a specialist ))
I've already done it on the test. Showed it in the thread a few pages ago). The system is conceptually close to A_K2. The implementation has nothing in common.
Now I have no plans to further develop or implement this system. Maybe by the fall.
I found some figure - 0.0018, everything came up without calculation.
what to what?
I've been racking my brain for two days, I don't know where or how to apply it...
If you've encountered something like this, please give me a hintI told you that you won't be done by New Year's Eve and you won't leave the forum. It's not pessimism, I just know what I'm saying.
I'm not a physicist, I'll be done with forex before the new year and I won't be here again.
When you get the symptoms of addiction, you should go to a specialist.)
:)))) I remember. I'm not even here because of forex, but because of people. There's some strange people here, the likes of which I've never seen in my life. It is interesting. And I have golden grail - it was just stolen by Misha from another thread and disappeared in neural wilderness :))). We should ask him to return. The wooden Grail I will soon present in the form of a signal.
found some figure-- 0.0018, it all came up without calculation.
What's the point?
I don't get it. What is that figure even about? ))
And you kept shouting, no, we physicists are mature, I'll be done with forex before the new year, and I won't set foot here.
Don't insinuate. A_K2 never said until what New Year's Eve.
Don't insinuate. A_K2 didn't say anywhere till which New Year.
I was thinking the same thing, by the way.
well, i'm thinking 35th.
//dropped the number.
:)))) I remember. I'm not even here for the Forex, I'm here for the people. There's some weirdos here you just don't see in your life. Interesting. And I have golden grail - it was just stolen by Misha from another thread and disappeared in neural wilderness :))). We should ask him to return. The wooden Grail I will soon present in the form of a signal.
CADJPY now for the candy?