You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Martingale lives from Monday to Monday?
:)
i wonder where the idea came from.
read on the forum that people trade deviations from the average during the flat?
Or did you see that in physical processes the particle dangles around the horizontal line and decided that the forex is the same ?)
unambiguously as if it "trembles" relative to 0 and is a wave function of the price itself.
This is a strictly medical fact.
It is sort of the foundation of the market itself.
It made sense to just follow the movement of this packet, collected at 99.5% (by sample volume), and get unrestrained profits.
But, it's not that simple....
This is the distribution of the increments
The price is unambiguously "trembling" around zero and is a wave function of the price itself.
and what is there to indicate that it is shaking around zero?)) gsb has the same distribution)
and what does it indicate that it is shaking around zero?)) gsb has the same distribution)
That's what the bottom chart indicates.
This is what we see the dynamics in just 4 days this week (about 140,000 ticks) If we collect the data for a month ( about 1,000,000 ticks) we see an almost normal distribution relative to 0.
i wonder where the idea came from.
did you read on the forum that people trade deviations from the average during a flat?
Or did you see that in physical processes a particle dangles around a horizontal line and decided that the forex is the same ?)
This is what the lower chart shows.
This we see the dynamics in just 4 days this week (about 140,000 ticks) If we collect the data for a month ( about 1,000,000 ticks), we see an almost normal distribution relative to 0.
so the lower chart is artificial. the upper chart is a price chart).
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and trading strategies testing
From Theory to Practice
Alexander_K2, 2018.01.26 15:47
This is what the lower chart is pointing to.
This we see the dynamics for just 4 days this week (about 140,000 ticks) If we collect the data for a month ( about 1,000,000 ticks) we see an almost normal distribution relative to 0.
Out of modesty, I won't tell you where the idea came from. But he did it on his own, there were no hints here, or only in his threads. Well, and something Wizard told him - did not go into it.
a. you tipped him off)
Out of modesty I won't tell you where the idea came from. But he did it on his own, there were no hints here, or only in his threads. Well, and something Wizard told him - did not get into.
Yes, the idea is good - no doubt about it. But, somehow, there's something missing... А! Understanding, that's what I'm missing. You're banging out programs based on price, I'm banging out a wave function. And Feynman based on what? That's right, the wave function. In quantum physics, there's no such thing as price. But according to you, there is. Here I am in a stupor...
Yes, the idea is good - no doubt about it. But, somehow, there's something missing... А! Understanding, that's what I'm missing. You're banging out programs based on price, I'm banging out a wave function. And Feynman based on what? That's right, the wave function. In quantum physics, there's no such thing as price. But according to you, there is. That's where I'm at a loss...
Alexander, may I use the fractality index (Hearst's coefficient)? As a filter.
Yeah. I'll try the model at the weekend. Somewhere in this thread Vladimir posted some great data on Hearst. I will have to read it again.