You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If it's working, but not quite, that tells a different story. And without that other, even if you use different sample sizes, it's no use. It's not clear what was revealed in the end. The history here is all Leo Tolstoy.
Agreed. I'm waiting for real-time trading to start. Already tweaked the program.
How will it all look to the audience?
Alas, yes. I work during the day and look at the results in the evening. Don't worry, Ilnur - everything will be fair. I'm not going to sell any signals here, I'm interested in the principle of solving the problem. I stand by my opinion - this problem is solvable. In quantum physics, it's not the kind of thing already solved.
You can only hear yourself, but for the second time: last week was a flat week, in such a market any return system will work, even the most primitive one. The trends will show what's what.)
. There was no alnorhythm given.
Was, download the file and read the descriptions just above. The formulas are in the cells. What else is needed? The algorithm from the example Excel file and the description is completely clear. I have already transferred formulas to my self-written terminal and the calculations have certainly coincided. I faced the lack of hardware resources for calculations of large tick volumes.
Compare the bottom graph of the average incremental value with the top graph of the price itself.
By the way, here is your "MA", which supposedly does not exist, but which you implicitly use without being aware of it) Shown with the yellow line. Subtract the yellow line ("trend") from the price, and you get your grey line (the cyclical component). Quite a poor "MA", and it's clear to everyone why - it ends up being just the price value N points backwards))) That is why, for example, it gives a huge jump down around 00:00 on the 18th of January, which is not in the original price.
If you want you can compare it with the pictureat https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page140#comment_6367756.
By the way, here is your "MA", which supposedly does not exist, but which you implicitly use without being aware of it) Shown by the yellow line. Subtract the yellow line ("trend") from the price, and you get your grey line (cyclical component). Quite a poor "MA", and it's clear to everyone why - it ends up being just the price value N points backwards))) That is why, for example, it gives a huge jump down around 00:00 on the 18th of January, which is not in the original price.
Those who wish may compare it with the pictureat https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page140#comment_6367756.
it looks like :)