From theory to practice - page 39
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Leonardo flew the model, but when it came to reality, the man fell off the tower on his wings and crashed to the ground.
Come on, everyone started out at some point. And many were euphoric and already counting the millions their 100 quid would turn into. It passes quickly. Don't be so dramatic.
And that's how brokers and brokerage companies live, and they have to keep bringing in new clients. Most fall off in the first few months.
There's a search facility here. This thread already has a solid smell of trolling...
If you leaf through it, there's a persistent whiff of trolling with a "quantum physics" signpost, and what a fun thing to do. Only is it worth feeding the troll?
Alexander_K2, I ran your model on other data, August and November. There are enough losing and near-zero trades there. Also, your model is not very robust, it depends on tick manipulation. If you feed it with thinned ticks (because VisSim cannot handle a big amount of ticks), then both entry points into deals and results of deals will change.
In general, our hopes for the grail are fading, while you have invented the bollinger)
Alexander_K2, I ran your model on other data, August and November. There are enough losing and near-zero trades there. Also, your model is not very robust, it depends on tick manipulation. If you feed it with thinned ticks (because VisSim cannot handle a big amount of ticks), then both entry points into deals and results of deals will change.
So our hopes for the grail are fading, while you have invented the bollinger)
I'm stuck, alexander_K2 wrote that the demo version is posted, while he has it in a different way. You only use some ersatz. What claims? It does not have to work.
So there is nothing to write about yet) you rolled out some model without meaning, and you refuse to state its meaning. What is there to discuss then?
Alexander_K2, how does your model manage to read ticks from csv file with 1 second step, if you have no time stamps in your input data?
Right click on the Ask and Bid .csv export blocks and set the time to Fixed Interval. This time should match the time in the Time Step field of the Simulation Properties menu. By this you select the speed of ticks reading.
Right click on the Ask and Bid .csv export blocks and set the time to Fixed Interval. This time should match the time in the Time Step field in the Simulation Properties menu. By doing so, you select the tick reading speed.
But ticks don't come with such exact interval in reality, therefore model error will be very high and as a consequence all conclusions will be incorrect.
Have you found topics like yours on the forum?
I'm stuck, Alexander_K2 wrote that the demo version is posted, and it's not the same for him. You only use some ersatz version. What are your complaints? It does not have to work.
Right click on the Ask and Bid .csv export blocks and set the time to Fixed Interval. This time should match the time in the Time Step field in the Simulation Properties menu. By doing so, you select the tick reading speed.
I want people to THINK and work independently. I'll just give a hint once in a while to the most persistent ones.
And you - I want people to THINK and work independently. I will only occasionally prompt the most persistent ones.
Wow.))
As they say - Counsellor, remember - counsellors get beaten).