Sparring on MetaQuotes-Demo demo accounts - page 115

[Yuriy Zaytsev]

Server Muradasilov:

Yes

The drawdown, I completely agree with the service signal.

Don't know what he'll say.

Andrey Dik

I don't think we should wake him up, he will probably agree ... I mean, at 20% it would be really sad and depressing.

№	Participant	Funds	Balance	Increase	Drawdown	C.Sharpe	P.fact.	Initial deposit	Start deposit	MT	Score
1	Igor Volodin	80 989.80	72 670.19	709.90%	42.92%	0.53	5.23	80%">170.60%	10 000.00 USD	5	2.00" class="plus sh dl1 col_click">2.334
2	Sergey Don	33 963.22	34 075.16	235.45%	14.24%	0.19	2.13	80%">96.98%	10 124.80 USD	4	1.699
3	Igor Rybakov	16 030.28	16 030.28	60.30%	3.44%	0.84	55.13	80%">99.87%	10 000.00 USD	4	1.658
4	Ziheng Zhuang	11 408.88	11 435.76	14.09%	10.78%	1.30	300.12	17.95%	10 000.00 USD	4	1.605

[Andrey Dik]

Vitaly Muzichenko:
OK, then whoever has more than 30% drawdown is automatically excluded from the second nomination. Right?

I was talking about 20%.

We need to add a 20% cutoff to the formula, everyone has forgotten about it. If the drawdown reached more than 20%, the score is equated to 0.0.

[Vitaly Muzichenko]

Sergey Gritsay suggested adding deposit loading to the calculations, but did not say how to use it. Maybe the results will be better?

[Andrey Dik]

Yuriy Zaytsev:

I don't think there's any need to wake him up, he'll probably agree... but really, at 20% it would be sad and depressing.

№	Participant	Funds	Balance	Increase	Drawdown	C.Sharpe	P.fact.	Initial deposit	Start deposit	MT	Score
1	Igor Volodin	80 989.80	72 670.19	709.90%	42.92%	0.53	5.23	80%">170.60%	10 000.00 USD	5	2.00" class="plus sh dl1 col_click">2.334
2	Sergey Don	33 963.22	34 075.16	235.45%	14.24%	0.19	2.13	80%">96.98%	10 124.80 USD	4	1.699
3	Igor Rybakov	16 030.28	16 030.28	60.30%	3.44%	0.84	55.13	80%">99.87%	10 000.00 USD	4	1.658
4	Ziheng Zhuang	11 408.88	11 435.76	14.09%	10.78%	1.30	300.12	17.95%	10 000.00 USD	4	1.605

Yeah, your place on the list is really sad and depressing. You should have dabbled less in drawdowns.

[Vitaly Muzichenko]

Andrey Dik:

It was about 20%.

We need to add a 20% cut-off to the formula, everyone has forgotten about it. If the drawdown reached more than 20%, the score is equated to 0.0.

Andrei, well 20% would be really unfortunate(

[Andrey Dik]

Vitaly Muzichenko:
Sergey Gritsay suggested adding deposit loading to the calculations, but did not say how to use it. Would the results be better?

No, loading is the use of funds. The bigger it is, the more efficiently the funds are used.

[Vitaly Muzichenko]

Andrey Dik:
No, loading is the use of funds. The bigger it is, the more effectively the funds are used.

Well, that's understandable, except that it is used, but not for long=)

[Server Muradasilov]

Andrey Dik:

It was about 20%.

We should add a 20% cut-off to the formula, everyone has forgotten about it. If the drawdown reached more than 20%, the score is equated to 0.0.

The golden mean is 25% ?

[Andrey Dik]

Server Muradasilov:

The gold median is 25% ?

Let it be like in the service - 30%. it's quite vital. more is stupid.

You can load the deposit at 100% and still keep the drawdown to 30%. This is the efficient use of funds at acceptable risks. Loading - efficient use of funds, drawdown - risk.

We can see where excessive risk leads. the leader is lucky. If the market goes the wrong way, he'll be blown off the podium in no time.

[Vitaly Muzichenko]

Server Muradasilov:

The gold median is 25% ?

Nothing definitive yet, we'll decide later when everyone arrives