I'm good at draining - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In terms of lot size yes. Or do you have a profit on an order already in the + at the time of opening? How is that possible? And what makes you think that your doubled position will go in the plus, and if it moves to the stop, it is already a loss along with the previous trade.
I may be smoking bamboo, do you think no one before you has done a martin with doubling after a profit? Code your idea, run it in the tester and then prove it. So far it's just talk and nothing more.
He meant at the moment of opening in profit cumulative position. And he puts a stop in the profit zone for the aggregate position. This is so called anti-martingale. Its results depend mainly on the quality of the signal system. If the quality is poor, increasing the lot will not do much good.
He meant at the time of opening in profit cumulative position. And he puts the stop for the aggregate position in the profit zone. This is so called anti-martingale. Its results will mainly depend on the quality of the signal system. If the quality is poor, increasing the lot will not do much good.
because you know what I mean, I'll tell you) .... and that stupid eugenius is a pain in the ass... ...he just pissed me off with his stupidity... You've been telling him for five hours about Thomas, but he's still telling you about Yereka ....
The signal system has nothing to do with it.... Moreover, the signal system has nothing to do with anything. entering by signal (any system) always means entering at any arbitrary time by flipping a coin... If it wasn't like that now all the owners of matlab downloaded from a torrent and maths teachers would build cottages and live in London...
What do you mean by martingale, and moreover what does the signal system have to do with it?... We're not talking about it here ... but the philosophical position that if conventional martingale with any signal system in the long run is losing money with 100% probability due to toxic betting system, the anti-martingale with the same (whatever) signal system should earn 100% in the long run ...
since you know what I mean, I'll answer you) .... and this clueless eugene is a pain in the ass... ...he just pissed me off with his stupidity... You've been telling him for five hours about Thomas, but he's still telling you about Yereka ....
The signal system has nothing to do with it.... moreover (this is my personal opinion) the signal system has nothing to do with anything. entering by signal (any system) always means entering at any arbitrary time by flipping a coin... if it were not so now all the owners of matlab downloaded from a torrent and mathematics teachers would build cottages and live in London...
If you're thinking about martingale then why is there a signal system involved ... we're not talking about it ... but the philosophical position that if conventional martingale with any signal system in the long run is losing money with 100% probability due to toxic betting system, the anti-martingale with the same (whatever) signal system should earn 100% in the long run ...
Here you are insulting a lot of people here calling them stupid, but what I highlighted shows your "not smart" oh how veiled) before you write about others (and yes me too) look in the mirror
... then anti-martingale with the same (no matter what) signalling system should work 100% in the long run...
You have insulted many people here by calling them stupid, but what I have highlighted shows your "not smart" (how veiled) before you write about others (and yes, me too) look in the mirror
no it is your not clever (and naive) - the belief that TA signals work... and your bullshit signal. having a 1% probability advantage the casinos are raking in millions on a regular basis...
if tA increased the probability by even half a percent the market would very quickly cease to exist....
How is it not important, at least 50/50, but it should be as good as it gets.
not counting the spread, any trace is always 50/50... what do signals have to do with it?
what difference does it make what spell you say before you flip a coin...does it change the odds...
TA is a set of spells before the flip... financial esoteric teachings...
You've insulted many people by calling them stupid, but what I have shown is that you are not smart. Before you write about others (and yes, it concerns me too), look in the mirror.
Watched two drunks talking about history and philosophy outside an inn. Learned a lot of "new things" for myself :) By the way, they thought they were smarter than others....
Oh man! All in forex are stupid, you just have to reverse martin, no matter how you enter the market. And you can also start trading with an average lot and in the case of a loss to reduce it, and if the trade is in the plus, then increase it.
... You can also start trading with an average lot and, in case of a loss, reduce it, and if the trade is profitable, increase it.
Why, that's quite a sensible approach.
Yes, I'm curious myself, I'll try it in the tester today.
Why, that's a perfectly reasonable approach.
Checked it out, it doesn't make sense.