You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's a pity.
Basically and I'm sorry too - as you could have created two variants: for the first variant there is already an algorithm outline in the first post, and the second variant - when all indicators are looking in the same direction.
You're sorry, I'm sorry too, and if you translate the word sorry into mathematical terms, it's a minus(-) sign.
So, you have minus, I have minus, so the formula F(x) =(-1)*(-1)=1 or true, so you have to do it!
You're sorry, I'm sorry too, and if you translate the word sorry into mathematical terms, it's a minus(-) sign.
So, you have minus, I have minus, so the formula is F(x) =(-1)*(-1)=1 or true, so you have to do it!
That's a dodgy one :).
I think it makes more sense to work with orders like buy stop limit and sell stop limit.
Let the man make a dummy that works according to this scheme, and the limiters instead of market ones, I think it is not particularly difficult to put
by the way here's a ready-made
https://www.mql5.com/ru/charts/6495106/eurusd-h1-metaquotes-software-corp
In general, the first two posts are enough. You can ask a question about the second hump, but you don't need to, because the writer of the terms of reference himself doesn't focus on the details, so he doesn't care.
Let the man make a dummy that works according to this scheme, and the limiters instead of market ones, I think it is not particularly difficult to put
by the way here's a ready-made
https://www.mql5.com/ru/charts/6495106/eurusd-h1-metaquotes-software-corp
That's where you're wrong.
why?