For those who like to measure... achievements))) - page 32

New comment
 
It turns out that the testing was wrong? And I almost believed in a brilliant result, although all is not lost, we should not stop there.
 

An advisor was ordered. It was a drain. Applied a little common sense and logic. This is what I got:



A year in a constant lot. What do I want to give it to him for...

 
artmedia70:

An advisor was ordered. It was draining. Applied a little common sense and logic. This is what I got:



A year as a regular lot. What do I want to give it to him for...


If it's so good, why give it away? ;)

 
Contender:


If he's so good, why give him away? ;)


Exactly. Only the quality of modelling is low. On the minutes?
 
Sta2066: Only the quality of modelling is low. On the minutes?
Opening prices. If on minutes on all ticks, it would be 25%.
 
The simulation is not trading, if we had a year of real trading here at least on a demo account, the numbers would be three and four digits for this EA.
 
Mathemat:
On opening prices. If on minutes on all ticks, it would be 25%.


Indeed.
 
Profitov:
The simulation is not trading, if we had a year of real trading here at least on a demo account, the numbers would be three and four digits for this EA.

If not brutal tweaking, it will live. But the EA will fail. You may develop and trade your own EA, or you may be an "ideologist" and programmer. Or the "ideologist" and the programmer work together. The author is not a novice. He must have posted it to make fun of himself.
 

From 27.12.13 to today - on the demo:

 
_new-rena:

From 27.12.13 to today - on the demo:

But I see you've had fewer trades. You went from a shotgun to a machine gun?
1...252627282930313233343536373839
New comment