For those who are convinced that all EAs with a martin are losing out. - page 28
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Russia is not threatened by this, Russians need to multiply, otherwise their place will be taken by people from Central Asia and China and Russia as such will disappear.
That is exactly the problem. Everybody did and we are going to what all ancient civilizations had come to. We do not even learn from others' mistakes and start all over again. This shows a lack of system.
All in all, a direct analogy with a martin or a bubble that grows and eventually bursts. Maybe this is the essence of the natural mechanism and we just can't do better? )))
There's no shame in being a teapot, it's a shame to remain one indefinitely. And to be a martin instead of a dilly.
Where have you been? Weeding beds? ;)
I missed you, Sanyok.
Where have you been? Have you been weeding? ;)
I missed you, Sanka.
That's exactly the problem. Everyone has done so and we end up going to what all ancient civilisations have come to. We don't even learn from the mistakes of others and start all over again. This shows the absence of a system.
All in all, a direct analogy with a martin or a bubble that grows and eventually bursts. Maybe this is the essence of the natural mechanism and we just can't do better? )))
And why don't you take into account the fact that people reproduce in want, while in developed countries the opposite process takes place. Look at the developed European countries - the population is maintained only by emigrants.
There is a process of degradation in Europe, a process of degeneration --- it needs new blood to counteract it. But the process of degeneration is irreversible. And new blood will lead to new forms.
There is a process of degradation in Europe, a process of degeneration --- it needs new blood to counter this. But the process of degeneration is irreversible. And new blood will lead to new forms.
There is a process of degradation in Europe, a process of degeneration --- it needs new blood to counter it.
You don't have to worry about Europe.
you better worry about the degeneration, degradation and debilitating of the population of the former Soviet Union. From where all this new blood is being successfully transfused into Europe.
The shortage of blood is not in Europe. There is nothing wrong with young professionals and fresh blood.
But where will the post-Soviet Union get its blood from - that is a dead end. maybe the chinese will help :)
You don't have to worry about Europe.
you better worry about the degeneration, degradation and debilitation of the population of the former Soviet Union. From where all this new blood is being successfully transfused into Europe.
The shortage of blood is not in Europe. It's fine with young professionals and fresh blood.
But where will the post-USSR get its blood from - that's a dead end. maybe the chinese will help :)
why so much emotion? Birth, development-generation, ageing-degeneration, death are natural processes and they do not depend on your emotions.
Though, I suspect that the word "degeneration" rings a bell for you - but it is not an offensive word and in some sense is the inverse of the "generation" process.
There is a wrong policy - instead of stimulating the birth rate of their own population, European governments spend huge amounts of money to support emigrants. We have seen what this leads to when pogroms organised by emigrants took place in the suburbs of Paris. Instead of giving thanks for the subsidies that many emigrants are surviving on because they do not want to work, they set cars on fire and smash up shops.
Have you ever tried to think why and why they have such a policy? Is it because they are stupid to pursue such a "wrong" policy? But for them, perhaps, it is the "right" policy? Forced to be "right"?
Why don't you take into account the fact that people are multiplying in want, while in developed countries the process is reversed. Look at the developed European countries - population maintenance is only due to immigrants.
First of all, we need to understand what you mean by "breeding in want"? It is not a problem for developed countries, but for the world as a whole. But in order to solve the problem, everyone has to take part. Most people don't even think about the problem because they don't know about it. I have partly checked this (by conducting surveys). A prosperous society is when we are not 'the more the better' and not 'the more we consume the better' but the opposite.
This is a very difficult question. I think it's more likely that our civilisation is waiting for the same thing as all previous civilisations. Only before the decline was local, now it will be global. Population growth will still grow quite rapidly and then decline rapidly.