Absolute courses - page 72

 
grell:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/10910 here indices with a rough count, the trends are clearly visible.


this is bullshit, not an index(. Especially the smoothed line, they've thrown out all the low-frequency info....
 
Joperniiteatr:


this is bullshit, not an index(. Especially the smoothed line, throwing out all the low-frequency info....

Put a period of 1 and all the noise will appear:)
 
grell:

Put in period 1 and all the noise will appear:)


That's not noise, that's info too.
 
grell:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/10910 here indices with a rough count, the trends are clearly visible.

The commentary there is good:

ktest0:

The quality of the description is striking in its depth of thought and coverage of the topic.

I join in.

 
Dr.F.:

The commentary there is good:

ktest0:

The quality of the description is striking in its depth of thought and coverage of the topic.

I join in.


Have you even looked at the code? How can I logically justify a hypothesis if, for example, the dollar index is calculated using a formula?

USD^7

iUSD = -----------------------------------------

AUD*CAD*CHF*EUR*GBP*JPY*NZD

 
Joperniiteatr:

0.998683^x + 1.00216908^x+ 1.002040888^x+ 0.998182^x+ 1.003999^x=1

And this x=?
 
grell:


Have you even looked at the code? How can I logically justify a hypothesis if, for example, the dollar index is calculated using a formula?

USD^7

iUSD = -----------------------------------------

AUD*CAD*CHF*EUR*GBP*JPY*NZD

You can't. Because it doesn't make any sense.
 
Joperniiteatr, Вы хотите чтобы Вам решили уравнение и указали значение х? 
 
Dr.F.:
It doesn't. Because it doesn't make any sense.

It does make sense, all that's left is to get it right. I will not add a description.
 
Joperniiteatr:



For a solution, go here