[ARCHIVE]Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass it by. Can't go anywhere without you - 5. - page 399
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm trying to make you understand a small point. A very IMPORTANT point: "what you wanted to prescribe" and "what you prescribed" are completely DIFFERENT things! If in the condition:
Minute() == 46, then the GENERAL condition does NOT WORK!!! How about this:
??? :-[
Thanks for the reply.Checked it out - indeed it does.
I used to have.
> =
But then I must have accidentally deleted > , or forgot to insert it when editing the code.And I noticed the changes now by accident in connection with the discussion of another problem.
Indeed, >= opens all candles from 45 to 49, and == only 45.
I don't understand just why you think that if Minute() == 46,(probably you meant 45) then the GENERAL condition doesn't work!!!
Maybe I don't quite understand what you mean by GENERAL condition, but in the code if((Minute( ) ==45)&&(Minute( ) <50))
only candles with exactly 45-minute opening time are opened.
Because if the condition did not work, the orders would not open ????????.
Thanks again.
Thank you for your reply.Checked it - it really is.
I used to have
But then I must have accidentally deleted > , or forgotten to insert it when editing the code.And I noticed the changes now by accident in connection with the discussion of another problem.
Indeed, >= opens all candles from 45 to 49, and == only 45.
I don't understand just why you think that if Minute() == 46,(maybe you meant 45) then the GENERAL condition doesn't work!
Maybe I don't quite understand what you mean by GENERAL condition, but in the code if((Minute( ) ==45)&&(Minute( ) <50))
only candles with exactly 45-minute opening time are opened.
If the condition did not work, the orders would not open ????????.
Thanks again.
What you really don't understand is that the two conditions
Are identical to one another:
??? And you don't know what I mean at all??? - then you need to go back to the very beginning (page 1 of the textbook and reread everything)... :(
What you really don't realise is that these two conditions:
are identical to one another:
??? You don't know what I'm talking about at all. - then you need to go back to the very beginning (page 1 of the textbook and reread the whole thing)... :(
I understand that. Thank you.
I just thought you mistakenly wrote 46 instead of 45.
I agree - at 46 the condition won't work.
Andrew, human (read philistine) logic is different from computer (read software) logic. Don't substitute one for the other! :)))
Igor, why are you confusing people? Either there is logic, or not. Don't make it up.
Igor, why are you confusing people? Logic either exists or it doesn't. You don't have to make it up.
Igor, why are you confusing people? Logic either exists or it doesn't. You don't have to invent anything.
Victor, that's what I mean: computer logic reads information "black and white" - as it is, while a person hasn't counted it yet, but has already made it up... :)))
What is computer logic?
What is computer logic?
I already made a note of the term computer logic (in this context), so I didn't repeat it in the previous post - "software" logic.
P.S. In this case I was using everyday language. If I didn't understand it, I'll get over it. :)))